Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring and Reducing Off-Target Activities of Programmable Nucleases Including CRISPR-Cas9

Open access
Koo, Taeyoung, Lee, Jungjoon, Kim, Jin-Soo·2015·Molecules and Cells

Abstract

Programmable nucleases, which include zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and RNA-guided engineered nucleases (RGENs) repurposed from the type II clustered, regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system are now widely used for genome editing in higher eukaryotic cells and whole organisms, revolutionising almost every discipline in biological research, medicine, and biotechnology. All of these nucleases, however, induce off-target mutations at sites homologous in sequence with on-target sites, limiting their utility in many applications including gene or cell therapy. In this review, we compare methods for detecting nuclease off-target mutations. We also review methods for profiling genome-wide off-target effects and discuss how to reduce or avoid offtarget mutations.1 PROGRAMMABLE NUCLEASES FOR GENOME EDITINGGenome editing is a method of modifying genome sequences in cells and whole organisms via custom-designed programmable nucleases (Kim and Kim, 2014), which cleave chromosomal DNA in a targeted manner, producing site-specific DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).These DSBs are efficiently repaired in cells by endogenous DNA repair systems known as homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), often causing site-specific genome modifications.This technique is now widely used in research, medicine, and biotechnology, a phenomenon that is highlighted by the choice of genome editing as the 2011 Method of the Year and one of the 2015 Methods to Watch by Nature Methods and as a Breakthrough of the Year runner-up by Science in 2013.For example, gene knockout using engineered nucleases enables identification and validation of drug-able target genes.Gene correction in stem and somatic cells can lead to gene therapy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14348/molcells.2015.0103

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Koo, T., Lee, J., & Kim, J.-S.
Venue
Molecules and Cells
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
475-481
ISSN
  • 0219-1032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1016-8478
OpenAlex
W2274986902
Cited by
207
References
23
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring and Reducing Off-Target Activities of Programmable Nucleases Including CRISPR-Cas9. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14348/molcells.2015.0103
The paper
Koo, T., Lee, J., & Kim, J.-S. (2015). Measuring and Reducing Off-Target Activities of Programmable Nucleases Including CRISPR-Cas9. Molecules and Cells. https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.0103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.