Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient genomic correction methods in human iPS cells using CRISPR–Cas9 system

Li, Hongmei Lisa, Gee, Peter, Ishida, Kentaro, Hotta, Akitsu·2016·Methods

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.015

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Kim, 2014, Nat. Rev. Genet., 15, 321, 10.1038/nrg3686 · DOI
  2. Hsu, 2014, Cell, 157, 1262, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Doudna, 2014, Science, 346, 1258096, 10.1126/science.1258096 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jinek, 2012, Science, 337, 816, 10.1126/science.1225829 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cong, 2013, Science, 339, 819, 10.1126/science.1231143 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Mali, 2013, Science, 339, 823, 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cho, 2013, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 230, 10.1038/nbt.2507 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jinek, 2013, Elife, 2, e00471, 10.7554/eLife.00471 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Takahashi, 2007, Cell, 131, 861, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Takahashi, 2006, Cell, 126, 663, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kamao, 2014, Stem Cell Rep., 2, 205, 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.12.007 · DOI
  12. Hotta, 2015, Annu. Rev. Genet., 49, 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054926 · DOI
  13. Hockemeyer, 2009, Nat. Biotechnol., 27, 851, 10.1038/nbt.1562 · DOI
  14. Hockemeyer, 2011, Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 731, 10.1038/nbt.1927 · DOI
  15. Ding, 2013, Cell Stem Cell, 12, 238, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.011 · DOI
  16. Ding, 2013, Cell Stem Cell, 12, 393, 10.1016/j.stem.2013.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bae, 2014, Nat. Methods, 11, 705, 10.1038/nmeth.3015 · DOI
  18. Li, 2015, Stem Cell Rep., 4, 143, 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ho, 2015, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, e17, 10.1093/nar/gku1198 · DOI
  20. Ran, 2013, Nat. Protoc., 8, 2281, 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Yang, 2013, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 9049, 10.1093/nar/gkt555 · DOI
  22. Miyaoka, 2014, Nat. Methods, 11, 291, 10.1038/nmeth.2840 · DOI
  23. Yusa, 2013, Nat. Protoc., 8, 2061, 10.1038/nprot.2013.126 · DOI
  24. Yusa, 2011, Nature, 478, 391, 10.1038/nature10424 · DOI
  25. Gonzalez, 2014, Cell Stem Cell, 15, 215, 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.018 · DOI
  26. Byrne, 2015, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, e21, 10.1093/nar/gku1246 · DOI
  27. Yang, 2013, Cell, 154, 1370, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.022 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Li, 2014, Dev. Growth Differ., 56, 63, 10.1111/dgd.12107 · DOI
  29. Pichavant, 2011, Mol. Ther., 19, 830, 10.1038/mt.2011.59 · DOI
  30. Hou, 2013, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 15644, 10.1073/pnas.1313587110 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Esvelt, 2013, Nat. Methods, 10, 1116, 10.1038/nmeth.2681 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Zetsche, 2015, Cell, 163, 759, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Wang, 2014, Science, 343, 80, 10.1126/science.1246981 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Hsu, 2013, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 827, 10.1038/nbt.2647 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kuscu, 2014, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 677, 10.1038/nbt.2916 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sander, 2007, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W599, 10.1093/nar/gkm349 · DOI
  37. Heigwer, 2014, Nat. Methods, 11, 122, 10.1038/nmeth.2812 · DOI
  38. O’brien, 2014, Bioinformatics, 30, 2673, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu354 · DOI
  39. Naito, 2015, Bioinformatics, 31, 1120, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu743 · DOI
  40. Cradick, 2014, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids, 3, e214, 10.1038/mtna.2014.64 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Bae, 2014, Bioinformatics, 30, 1473, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Altschul, 1990, J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403, 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Langmead, 2009, Genome Biol., 10, R25, 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Li, 2010, Bioinformatics, 26, 589, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Ishida, 2015, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 16, 10.3390/ijms161024751 · DOI
  46. Matsui, 2014, PLoS ONE, 9, e104957, 10.1371/journal.pone.0104957 · DOI
  47. Hotta, 2008, J. Cell. Biochem., 105, 940, 10.1002/jcb.21912 · DOI
  48. Mashiko, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 3355, 10.1038/srep03355 · DOI
  49. Costa, 2007, Nat. Protoc., 2, 792, 10.1038/nprot.2007.105 · DOI
  50. Okita, 2011, Nat. Methods, 8, 409, 10.1038/nmeth.1591 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Ochiai, 2010, Genes Cells, 15, 875, 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01425.x · DOI
  52. Ramakrishna, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 3378, 10.1038/ncomms4378 · DOI
  53. Vouillot, 2015, G3, 5, 407, 10.1534/g3.114.015834 · DOI
  54. Urnov, 2010, Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 636, 10.1038/nrg2842 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Bell, 2014, BMC Genomics, 15, 1002, 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1002 · DOI
  56. Dahlem, 2012, PLoS Genet., 8, e1002861, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002861 · DOI
  57. Thomas, 2014, PLoS ONE, 9, e114632, 10.1371/journal.pone.0114632 · DOI
  58. Koo, 2015, Mol. Cells, 38, 475, 10.14348/molcells.2015.0103 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Ancient DNA analysis

    Orlando, L., Allaby, R., Skoglund, P., Der Sarkissian, C., Stockhammer, P. W., Ávila-Arcos, M. C., Fu, Q., Krause, J., Willerslev, E., Stone, A. C., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-020-00011-0 · Cited by 411

See all 62

Metadata

Authors
Li, H. L., Gee, P., Ishida, K., & Hotta, A.
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
101
Pages
27-35
ISSN
1046-2023
Cited by
62
References
6
Language
en
Funders
  • JSPS KAKENHI (15H05581)
  • AMED Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review