Cited by 4Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Factor structure and invariance analysis of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale—revised (CESD-R) in a Brazilian population

Open access
Faro, Andre, Nunes dos Santos, Daiane, Eaton, William W., Department of Psychology, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil, Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University (JHU), Baltimore, MD, USA, Department of Psychology, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil, Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University (JHU), Baltimore, MD, USA·2021·Suma Psicológica

Abstract

Introduction: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale – Revised (CESD-R) was developed to provide an efficient screening scale for depression syndrome, mimicking the original CESD, one of the most widely used screening tools to measure depressive symptoms globally. This investigation examined the factor structure of the CESD-R with a non-clinical Brazilian population. Method: We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of two adult samples, and also conducted invariance analysis by sex and place of residence of the participants. The full sample consisted of 1,427 adults, divided into two groups. The first sample (n = 400) was used for the EFA and the second sample (n = 1027) for the CFA. Results: The EFA indicated an internal structure composed of a single factor, which explained 53.2% of the variance. The CFA attested to the unidimensionality of the measure. Fit indices and reliability indicators showed values higher than expected, without modifications in the initial structure. The model was invariant in relation to the variables investigated at four different levels (configural, metric, scalar, and strict). Conclusions: Our findings support the utility of the CESD-R and suggest its validity for application to the Brazilian population in general.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14349/sumapsi.2021.v28.n1.2

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2 nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Carleton, R. N., Thibodeau, M. A., Teale, M. J., Welch, P. G., Abrams, M. P., Robinson, T., & Asmundson, G. J. (2013). The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A review with a theo- retical and empirical examination of item content and factor structure. PLoS ONE, 8, e58067. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour- nal.pone.0058067 · DOI
  3. Chung, K., Jeon, M-J., Park, J., Lee, S., Kim, C. O., & Park, J. Y. (2018). Development and evaluation of a mobile-optimized daily self-rating depression screening app: A preliminary study. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0199118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0199118 · DOI
  4. Damásio, B. F. (2012). Uso da análise fatorial exploratória em psico- logia. Avaliação Psicológica: Interamerican Journal of Psycho- logical Assessment, 11(2), 213-228. https://bit.ly/3parClC
  5. Eaton, W. W., Muntaner, C., Smith, C., Tien, A., & Ybarra, M. (2004). Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Re- view and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and out- comes assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 363-377).
  6. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reli- ability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural Equation Modelling: Present and Future (pp. 195-216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software Inter- national, Inc.
  7. Mohebbi, M., Nguyen, V., McNeil, J. J., Woods, R. L., Nelson, M. R., Shah, R. C.,... & Wolfe, R. (2018). Psychometric properties of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies De- pression (CES-D-10) scale for screening depressive symptoms in healthy community dwelling older adults. General Hos- pital Psychiatry, 51, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gen- hosppsych.2017.08.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faro, A., Nunes dos Santos, D., Eaton, W. W., Department of Psychology, F. U. O. S., Department of Mental Health, B. S. O. P. H., Department of Psychology, F. U. O. S., & Department of Mental Health, B. S. O. P. H.
Affiliations
  • Federal University of Sergipe (UFS)
  • Federal University of Sergipe
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Suma Psicológica
Published
2021-04-30
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
10-16
ISSN
  • 0121-4381 (ISSN-L)
  • 2145-9797
OpenAlex
W3140549307
Cited by
4
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Suma Psicológica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, depression screening, factor structure, measurement invariance, unidimensionality, Brazilian adults, psychometric validation, sex differences, place of residence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review