Cited by 4scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Citation Accuracy in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals indexed in the Web of Science

Open access
Khodabakhshi, Najme, Shekofteh, Maryam, Kazerani, Maryam, Jambarsang, Sara·2021·DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology

Abstract

The accuracy of the citations is crucial in scientific writing. The present study aims to investigate the accuracy of citations in the obstetrics and gynecology journals indexed in the Web of Science. Major and minor citation errors, type of errors, and citation errors in the Q1 to Q4 journals investigate as the objectives. The journals were retrieved by searching the “Obstetrics & Gynecology” category in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) in the Web of Science, and journals in different quartiles (Q1-Q4) were identified by applying the JIF Quartile filter. Eight hundred forty citations were selected from articles in the first five Q1 to Q4 journals using systematic sampling and article type citations were included in the study (730 citations). Bibliographic elements were assessed for citation errors. Findings show that 554 citations (75.89 %) involved errors. Only 24.1 per cent of the citations had no errors. The highest citation errors were related to the volume and issue, with 582 major errors (79.72 %). The citation accuracy in the Q2 and Q3 journals is higher than in other journals. The high rate of citation errors, especially in volumes and numbers, indicates that the journals need to pay attention to citation accuracy in these sections and the use of valid and complete citation styles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14429/djlit.41.5.16620

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Azadeh F. & Vaez, r. The accuracy of dissertations of medical Ph.d. Thesis and their correspondence with Vancouver style, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Heal. Inf. Manage., 2013, 10(4), 11-8. https:// www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?Id=405197. (Accessed on 15 June 2020).
  2. Ochieng, D. The progress of digital technologies in solving chronic education challenges: The case of citation and referencing errors. J. Learn. Teach. Digit. Age, 2019, 4(2), 33-41. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216625/ (Accessed on 18 June 2020).
  3. yap, J.M. Common errors found in APA citation: Basis to improve the information literacy program. In The 4 th Annual International Conference on Academic Integrity, May 2019. Nur-Sultan: Nazarbayev University. 2019. pp. 52-61. http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/4074 (Accessed on 20 March 2020).
  4. Maurer, H.; Kappe, F. & Zaka, B. Plagiarism: A survey. J. Univers. Comput. Sci., 2006, 12(8), 1050-84. http:// jucs.org/jucs_12_8/plagiarism_a_survey/jucs_12_08 _1050_1084_maurer.pdf (Accessed on 15 Jul 2020).
  5. Gupta, V.K. Citation errors in scholarly communication: A critical evaluation. Indian J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2017, 11(2), 228-33. doi: 10.21088/ijlis.0973.9548.11217.20. · DOI
  6. Asano, M.; Mikawa, K.; nishina, K.; Maekawa, n. & Obara, H. The accuracy of references in Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 1995, 50(12), 1080-2. doi: 10.1007/BF03015478. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khodabakhshi, N., Shekofteh, M., Kazerani, M., & Jambarsang, S.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR)
Venue
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
Published
2021-08-26
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
368-373
ISSN
  • 0974-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 0976-4658
OpenAlex
W3197408690
Cited by
4
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
citation accuracy, citation errors, bibliographic errors, obstetrics and gynecology journals, Web of Science, citation styles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review