The DOI matches its DataCite record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision-making on reverse logistics in the construction industry
Open accessAbstract
With the growing competition, many construction organizations attempt to improve their productivity, quality, and efficiency. Construction waste management, by means of reverse logistics, becomes a key issue to improve the productivity, and raise the company’s green image. In this study, four reverse logistics methods-direct reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, and landfill-are considered to manage construction and demolition (C&D) waste. Two factors (economic and site-specific) with their 15 sub-factors affecting the decisions to implement the reverse logistics are examined. The hierarchy model of reverse logistics decisions, developed through the analytic hierarchy process, reveal the importance of the economic factor over the site-specific factor. It is suggested that the transportation cost, the processing cost, the specific sorting technology, and the limited project time must be first considered before making decisions on reverse logistics plans. The construction company can utilize the developed hierarchy model to decide on the most appropriate reverse logistics plan to achieve the best benefits.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One potential reuse driver is the scarcity of landfilling sites, which helps the environment by avoiding the dumping of reusable waste into landfills (Chau et al., 2012; Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016
In the citing paper
“Another barrier to reuse, as reported in several articles, is the lack of an established market for the reused building components (Chileshe et al., 2016a, 2016b; Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016; Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Shaurette, 2006 (among others)).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016
In the citing paper
“It is because there is usually a high pressure to complete construction projects as early as possible (Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016
In the citing paper
“Consequently, this practise may raise cash flow problems and increase the overall cost of the project due to additional storage costs, which is another barrier to the BCR (Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Yeung et al., 2015 (among others)).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016
In the citing paper
“This lack of space for storage (Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016; Dunant et al., 2017, 2018; Gorgolewski, 2008; Rose and Stegemann, 2018; Shaurette, 2006) results in the transportation and storage of the recovered components at a different location and would increase the overall cost of the reused elements.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016
Citations
Cites
Network design for reverse logistics☆
SRIVASTAVA, S. (2008) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.11.012 · Cited by 623
Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand
Kofoworola, O. F., & Gheewala, S. H. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.004 · Cited by 346
Professional Construction Management
Barrie, D. S., & Paulson, B. C. (1976) · Journal of the Construction Division · doi:10.1061/jcceaz.0000620 · Cited by 305
Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations
Peng, C.-L., Scorpio, D. E., & Kibert, C. J. (1997) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461997373105 · Cited by 291
Sustainable Industrial Design and Waste Management: Cradle-to-Cradle for Sustainable Development
El‐Haggar, S. M. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 224
Generation and management of construction and demolition waste in Greece—an existing challenge
Fatta, D., Papadopoulos, A., Avramikos, E., Sgourou, E., Moustakas, K., Kourmoussis, F., Mentzis, A., & Loizidou, M. (2003) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(03)00035-1 · Cited by 215
Rate of Reusable and Recyclable Waste in Construction
Tam, V. W. Y. (2011) · The Open Waste Management Journal · doi:10.2174/1876400201104010028 · Cited by 48
Project Feedback as a Tool for Learning
Junnonen, J., & Kärnä, S. (2005) · Cited by 14
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS OF REVERSE LOGISTICS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
Chinda, T., Kaewpitak, P., Supsinpaibool, P., Virivaroj, T., & Tangbunjardvanich, S. (2013) · International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM) · doi:10.32738/ceppm.201310.0010 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Cited by
Guerra, B. C., Shahi, S., Mollaei, A., Skaf, N., Weber, O., Leite, F., & Haas, C. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129125 · Cited by 196
Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review
Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Chinda, T., & Ammarapala, V.
- Corresponding author
- Thanwadee Chinda
- ORCID
- Thanwadee Chinda
- Venue
- Research and Development Office, Prince of Songkla University
- Publisher
- Research and Development Office, Prince of Songkla University
- Published
- 2016
- OpenAlex
- W2184920270
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doaj.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NRCT Data Center
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Keywords
- reverse logistics, construction and demolition waste, construction waste management, decision-making, direct reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, landfill, economic factors, site-specific factors, transportation costs, processing cost, green image, hierarchical models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
