The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations
Abstract
Establishing a successful construction/demolition (C&D) waste recyling operation in the USA is a challenge today, especially because secondary materials markets have not yet matured. Increasingly, municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill operations refuse to accept C&D waste. Skyrocketing tipping fees due to the scarcity of landfill sites, and growing concerns from regulatory agencies and the public, have placed C&D waste recycling operations under intense scrutiny. The experiences of regional C&D recyclers indicate that successful recycling operations require a minimum of 0.8 ha of clear space for processing equipment, incoming waste stockpiles, recycled materials, and manoeuvring room for mobile equipment and operations. Reasonable quality, reliable equipment suitable for these operations generally costs between $300 000 and $750 000 for a 400–500 tonne/day operation. At present, operators of these facilities make a profit almost solely on tipping fees, with the recycling operation functioning mainly to maintain materials throughput. Different categories of C&D recycling machinery and waste processing strategies are presented. Strategies for converting C&D landfills into successful C&D recycling operations are also examined. C&D waste recycling economics are presented to demonstrate the essential ingredients for successful operations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle
Huang, B., Wang, X., Kua, H., Geng, Y., Bleischwitz, R., & Ren, J. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029 · Cited by 1,047
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 · Cited by 706
Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management
Yuan, H., & Shen, L. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030 · Cited by 574
A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction
Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018 · Cited by 353
Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Kadiri, K. O. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.001 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, C.-L., Scorpio, D. E., & Kibert, C. J.
- Venue
- Construction Management and Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-58
- ISSN
- 0144-6193 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-433X
- OpenAlex
- W2057927680
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/014461997373105
- The paper
- Peng, C.-L., Scorpio, D. E., & Kibert, C. J. (1997). Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations. Construction Management and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997373105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.