Cited by 22Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSurgical Simulation and TrainingArtificial Intelligence in Education

Artificial intelligence for education, proctoring, and credentialing in cardiovascular medicine

Open access
Krajcer, Zvonimir·2022·Texas Heart Institute Journal

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are rapidly gaining popularity in every aspect of cardiovascular medicine. This review discusses the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence in education, remote proctoring, credentialing, research, and publication as they pertain to cardiovascular procedures. This review describes the benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence and machine learning and the exciting potential of integrating advanced simulation, holography, virtual reality, and extended reality into disease diagnosis and patient care, as well as their roles in cardiovascular research and education. Nonetheless, much of the available data resides in electronic medical records or within industry-sponsored proprietary programs that are not compatible or standardized for current clinical application. Many areas in cardiovascular medicine would benefit from the introduction or increased use of artificial intelligence. Web-based artificial intelligence applications could be used to address unmet needs for education, on-demand procedural proctoring, credentialing, and recredentialing for interventionists and physicians in remote locations. Further progress in artificial intelligence will require further collaboration among computer scientists and researchers in order to identify and correct the most relevant problems and to implement the best data-based approach to achieving this goal. The future success of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine will depend on the degree of collaboration between all pertinent experts in this field. This will undoubtedly be a prolonged, stepwise process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14503/thij-21-7572

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI can be used to analyze applicant data and identify candidates who are most likely to succeed in a given program.

    “AI can be used to analyze applicant data and identify candidates who are most likely to succeed in a given program.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krajcer, Z.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Krajcer, Zvonimir
Venue
Texas Heart Institute Journal
Published
2022
Volume
49
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0730-2347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-6702
OpenAlex
W4225100128
Cited by
22
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Texas Heart Institute Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, machine learning, medical education, remote proctoring, credentialing, cardiovascular procedures, virtual reality, extended reality, holography, simulation, electronic health records, data standardization, cardiovascular research
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Credentialing, Forecasting, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review