The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
Open accessAbstract
Data mining project managers can benefit from using standard data mining process models. The benefits of using standard process models for data mining, such as the de facto and the most popular, Cross-Industry-Standard-Process model for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) are reduced cost and time. Also, standard models facilitate knowledge transfer, reuse of best practices, and minimize knowledge requirements. On the other hand, to unlock the potential of ever-growing textual data such as publications, patents, social media data, and documents of various forms, digital innovation is increasingly needed. Furthermore, the introduction of cutting-edge machine learning tools and techniques enable the elicitation of ideas. The processing of unstructured textual data to generate new and useful ideas is referred to as idea mining. Existing literature about idea mining merely overlooks the utilization of standard data mining process models. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to propose a reusable model to generate ideas, CRISP-DM, for Idea Mining (CRISP-IM). The design and development of the CRISP-IM are done following the design science approach. The CRISP-IM facilitates idea generation, through the use of Dynamic Topic Modeling (DTM), unsupervised machine learning, and subsequent statistical analysis on a dataset of scholarly articles. The adapted CRISP-IM can be used to guide the process of identifying trends using scholarly literature datasets or temporally organized patent or any other textual dataset of any domain to elicit ideas. The ex-post evaluation of the CRISP-IM is left for future study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180338 · Cited by 1,002
Cited by
Modelling carbon emission intensity: Application of artificial neural network
Acheampong, A. O., & Boateng, E. B. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.352 · Cited by 256
Basak, J. K., Okyere, F. G., Arulmozhi, E., Park, J., Khan, F., & Kim, H. T. (2020) · Journal of Applied Animal Research · doi:10.1080/09712119.2020.1761818 · Cited by 39
OES-Fed: a federated learning framework in vehicular network based on noise data filtering
Lei, Y., Wang, S. L., Su, C., & Ng, T. F. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1101 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
- Published
- 2025-11-14
- ISSN
- 2156-5570 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-107X
- OpenAlex
- W3158013077
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14569/issn.2156-5570
- The paper
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. (2025). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. https://doi.org/10.14569/issn.2156-5570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.