Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations

Open access
Andreou, Athanasios, Venkatadri, Giridhari, Goga, Oana, Gummadi, Krishna P., Loiseau, Patrick, Mislove, Alan·2018·Proceedings 2018 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium

Abstract

Targeted advertising has been subject to many privacy complaints from both users and policy makers.Despite this attention, users still have little understanding of what data the advertising platforms have about them and why they are shown particular ads.To address such concerns, Facebook recently introduced two transparency mechanisms: a "Why am I seeing this?" button that provides users with an explanation of why they were shown a particular ad (ad explanations), and an Ad Preferences Page that provides users with a list of attributes Facebook has inferred about them and how (data explanations).In this paper, we investigate the level of transparency provided by these two mechanisms.We first define a number of key properties of explanations and then evaluate empirically whether Facebook's explanations satisfy them.For our experiments, we develop a browser extension that collects the ads users receive every time they browse Facebook, their respective explanations, and the attributes listed on the Ad Preferences Page; we then use controlled experiments where we create our own ad campaigns and target the users that installed our extension.Our results show that ad explanations are often incomplete and sometimes misleading while data explanations are often incomplete and vague.Taken together, our findings have significant implications for users, policy makers, and regulators as social media advertising services mature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14722/ndss.2018.23191

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 1,477

Metadata

Authors
Andreou, A., Venkatadri, G., Goga, O., Gummadi, K. P., Loiseau, P., & Mislove, A.
Venue
Proceedings 2018 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W2793294490
Cited by
1,477
References
8
FWCI
291.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14722/ndss.2018.23191
The paper
Andreou, A., Venkatadri, G., Goga, O., Gummadi, K. P., Loiseau, P., & Mislove, A. (2018). Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations. Proceedings 2018 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2018.23191

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.