The Restructuring of Korea's Work-Life Balance Policy and the Improvement of Social Quality
Abstract
In South Korea, low fertility rate has become a big social issue, making the term ‘ultra low fertility rate’ common. Currently, South Korea, like many other leading industrialized countries, is coping with the problem of low fertility with a focus on the work-life balance policy. Unfortunately, South Korea’s work-life balance policy has been criticized as not so successful. Especially, it has been pointed out that the policy effects are being compromised because ‘it is not because there is no system, but the existing system does not work properly.’ This means that work-life balance policy in South Korea has a structural and fundamental problem. In this regard, it is necessary to reflect on policy discourses and instruments that determine the goals, directions and content of the policy. The result of the analysis in this paper reveals that South Korea’s work-life balance policy consists of the discourse of ‘raising the fertility rate’ and its policy instruments. It mobilizes citizens for the national goals of social reproduction and sustainable growth. It could be said that this reversal of purpose and means was because the policy makers and executives were buried in developmentalist thinking―in pursuit of materialistic social development. In this respect, in order for South Korea’s work-life balance policy to be on its way, it is urgently required that it should shift its policy paradigm to change practices and cultures. This paper argues that such a paradigm shift should be based on a ‘Social Quality Approach’. Only when we pursue humanistic social development in the planning and implementation of policies and continue to monitor and supplement related systems under this stance, can we achieve a stable and effective work-life balance policy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Work-life balance has been declared a political goal by governments in both Japan and Korea but remains unattainable to a large part for female and male employees.
“Work-life balance has been declared a political goal by governments in both countries but remains unattainable to a large part for female and male employees (for Japan, cf.Aronsson, 2014; for Korea cf.Park, 2019)”
From The Oldest Societies in Asia: The Politics of Ageing in South Korea and Japan (2021) · cites this paper as Park, 2019
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Oldest Societies in Asia: The Politics of Ageing in South Korea and Japan
Klein, A., & Mosler, H. (2021) · Global Political Demography · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73065-9_8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Department of Social Welfare, F. E. U., & PARK, B.-Y.
- Corresponding author
- PARK, Bo-young
- ORCID
- PARK, Bo-young
- Venue
- Korean Journal of Converging Humanities
- Published
- 2019-05-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 17-51
- ISSN
- 2288-6222 (ISSN-L)
- 2288-7512
- OpenAlex
- W2947062852
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Korean Journal of Converging Humanities (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- work-life balance policies, low fertility, fertility rate, developmentalism, policy paradigm shift, social reproduction, sustainable growth, policy discourse, South Korea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review