The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software
Open accessAbstract
Research findings in recent years provide compelling evidence of the importance of encouraging student control over the learning process as a whole. The socially based tools and technologies of the Web 2.0 movement are capable of supporting informal conversation, reflexive dialogue and collaborative content generation, enabling access to a wide raft of ideas and representations. Used appropriately, these tools can shift control to the learner, through promoting learner agency, autonomy and engagement in social networks that straddle multiple real and virtual learning spaces independent of physical, geographic, institutional and organisational boundaries. As argued in this article, however, in order for self-regulated learning to come to fruition, students need not only to be able to choose and personalise what tools and content are available, but also to have access to the necessary scaffolding to support their learning. Emerging practices with social computing technologies, a number of examples of which are showcased in this article, signal the need for pedagogies that are more personal, social and participatory. The authors conclude with a discussion of some of the key implications for practice, including an outline of the current challenges faced by tertiary educators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · cited 1×
“The meaning of scaffolding is no longer confined to its original association of expertise provided by a knowledgeable other (Wood, Bruner & Ross, 1976), but has expanded to include learner selected assistance, peer interactions, or could be embedded in technology.”
BackgroundHelp Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments
Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543073003277 · Cited by 609
Cited by
E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis
Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/2042753018785180 · Cited by 658
Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education
Cronin, C. (2017) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096 · Cited by 462
Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology
Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.568417 · Cited by 398
Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook
Manca, S. (2020) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707 · Cited by 347
Pan, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294 · Cited by 329
“…use (Kennedy et al., 2008), perceived usefulness of technology (Goodyear and Ellis, 2008; Teo, 2011), perception of the utility of technological resources (Clark et al., 2009), and the scaffolding available in supporting the technology-enhanced learning experience (McLoughlin and Lee, 2010).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W.
- Venue
- Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
- Published
- 2010-03-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1449-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1449-5554
- OpenAlex
- W1758841086
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 107.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14742/ajet.1100
- The paper
- McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.