The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level
Open accessAbstract
Flexible delivery of educational resources must take account of cultural variables and recognise the specific learning needs, preferences and styles of learners. In designing instruction, there may be a tension between the need to ensure access for a diverse student population, while at the same time taking into account the need for localisation to accommodate learners' particular cultures, cognitive styles and preferences. Considering the micro and macro cultural levels of instructional design is therefore essential if appropriate learning environments are to be created. The acceptance, use and impact of WWW sites is affected by the cultural backgrounds, values, needs and preferences of learners.One of the limitations in current instructional design models is that they do not fully contextualise the learning experience, and are themselves the product of particular cultures. The design of Web based instruction is not culturally neutral, but instead is based on the particular epistemologies, learning theories and goal orientations of the designers themselves. Recently, theorists have argued for a cultural dimension in the design process and the need to provide culturally sensitive learning environments. In this paper, we trace the design processes involved in the development of an online learning environment for indigenous Australian learners preparing to enter university, and account for the cultural issues that impacted on creation of learning tasks and styles of communication. The paper argues for cultural localisation, which means incorporating the local values, styles of learning and cognitive preferences of the target population. It also means going beyond surface level design considerations, to achieve culturally inclusive constructivist learning environments. Examples of tasks, activities and forms of online interaction are provided in the context of a bi-cultural model of learning that recognises diversity and different learning needs. It is recommended that when creating WWW based course support sites for cultural inclusivity, systematic attention must be given to particular design guidelines, which include responsiveness to learner needs, community based learning and cultural contextualisation of learning activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Cited by
(2010) · Cited by 241
Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T. (2007) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9033-x · Cited by 214
Cultural diversity online: student engagement with learning technologies
Hannon, J., & D'Netto, B. (2007) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/09513540710760192 · Cited by 166
Learning in an online distance education course: Experiences of three international students
Zhang, Z., & Kenny, R. (2010) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.775 · Cited by 134
Power Distance in Online Learning: Experience of Chinese Learners in U.S. Higher Education
Zhang, Y. (. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1557 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R.
- Venue
- Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
- Published
- 2000-05-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1449-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1449-5554
- OpenAlex
- W2155520608
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.