CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

AI in Tertiary Education: Progress on Research and Practice

Open access
Thompson, Kate, Corrin, Linda, Lodge, Jason M.·2023·Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
DOI 10.14742/ajet.9251
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has had a significant impact in tertiary education for practitioners and researchers during 2023. We review the way in which academics have made sense of generative AI, revisit our proposed research agenda and reflect on our changing roles as academics in relation to learning, teaching, design and policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14742/ajet.9251

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misconceptions about what AI is and how it works remain common.

    “As reported by Thompson et al. (2023), p. 3), 'there is still sensemaking work to be done, as misconceptions about what AI is and how it works remain common'.”

    From A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research (2026) · cites this paper as Thompson et al. (2023), p. 3

    In “Revisiting a research agenda for generative AI in higher education,” the paper says that misconceptions about generative AI remain common. The citing sentence omits “generative” from what it presents as a quotation, broadening the statement to AI generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Thompson, K., Corrin, L., & Lodge, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Published
2023-12-22
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1449-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-5554
DOI
10.14742/ajet.9251
OpenAlex
W4390096640
Cited by
31
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
generative AI, higher education, academic roles, research agenda, teaching-learning process, educational design, education policy, artificial intelligence in higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review