Cited by 8Hepatitis B Virus StudiesIntramuscular injections and effectsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Summary of the NACI Update on the Recommended Use of Hepatitis B Vaccine

Open access
Henry, B, Baclic, O·2017·Canada Communicable Disease Report

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infant and adolescent hepatitis B (HB) immunization programs have been successfully implemented in all Canadian provinces and territories since the 1990s. Following the introduction of universal immunization programs, the incidence of HB has decreased in all age groups. However, the duration of protection against chronic infection, as measured by preserved T- and B-cell memory, remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence on long-term protection against HB in adolescents who received routine immunization in infancy, determine the level of risk of HB infection in Canadians with diabetes and assess the timing of re-vaccination of individuals with immunocompromising conditions. METHODS: The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Hepatitis Working Group reviewed key questions and performed an evidence review and synthesis. In consideration of the burden of illness to be prevented, the target population and issues related to safety, immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness of the vaccine, the group proposed recommendations for vaccine use to NACI. All evidence was rated and summarized in tables. NACI approved specific evidence-based recommendations and elucidated the rationale and relevant considerations in the Statement update. RESULTS: In addition to the epidemiological data assessment, NACI reviewed evidence from efficacy and effectiveness studies with up to 30 years of follow-up data as well as data from 39 publications on immune response following the administration of a HB booster dose in individuals who were immunized as infants. Based on the conducted review, NACI did not find evidence that would support a change to its current recommendation that there is no need for routine booster immunization of individuals immunized in infancy and that there is no evidence to support preferential immunization schedules or routine immunization of individuals with diabetes. CONCLUSION: NACI now recommends that following immunization of immunocompromised individuals, initial annual monitoring of HB antibody levels may be considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14745/ccdr.v43i05a04

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For hepatitis B virus, which has an incubation period of 6 weeks to 6 months, a vaccinated individual is usually protected following vaccination even if exposure to the virus occurs some time after vaccination and the levels of vaccine-induced antibody have already waned.

    “in the case of HBV, which has an incubation period of 6 weeks to 6 months, a vaccinated individual is usually protected following vaccination even if exposure to the virus occurs some time after vaccination and the levels of vaccine-induced antibody have already waned41.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hollinger F, Liang TJ. Hepatitis B virus. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, et al, editors. Fields Virology. 4th ed. ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 2001. p. 2971-3036.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henry, B., & Baclic, O.
Affiliations
Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
Venue
Canada Communicable Disease Report
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
104-106
ISSN
  • 1188-4169 (ISSN-L)
  • 1481-8531
OpenAlex
W2793017596
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Canada Communicable Disease Report (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada
  • Public Health Agency
  • Canadian Armed Forces
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Health Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
hepatitis B vaccine, long-term vaccine protection, booster vaccination, adolescents, diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised patients, vaccination schedule

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review