CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurology of foreign language aptitude

Biedroń, Adriana·2015·Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
DOI 10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.1.2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This state-of-the art paper focuses on the poorly explored issue of foreign language aptitude, attempting to present the latest developments in this field and reconceptualizations of the construct from the perspective of neuroscience. In accordance with this goal, it first discusses general directions in neurolinguistic research on foreign language aptitude, starting with the earliest attempts to define the neurological substrate for talent, sources of difficulties in the neurolinguistic research on foreign language aptitude and modern research methods. This is followed by the discussion of the research on the phonology of foreign language aptitude with emphasis on functional and structural studies as well as their consequences for the knowledge of the concept. The subsequent section presents the studies which focus on lexical and morphosyntactic aspects of foreign language aptitude. The paper ends with a discussion of the limitations of contemporary research, the future directions of such research and selec ed methodological issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.1.2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of empirical studies on the neurological substrates of FL aptitude is growing, producing accumulating evidence that is consistent and replicable across studies.

    “the number of empirical studies on the neurological substrates of FL aptitude is growing, producing accumulating evidence that is consistent and replicable across studies (Biedroń 2015; also see Li, Legault & Litcofsky 2014).”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Biedroń 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Amunts, K., Schleicher, A., & Zilles, K. (2004). Outstanding language competence and cytoarchitecture in Broca's speech region. Brain and Language, 89(2), 346-353. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00360-2 · DOI
  2. Baqués J., Castellà, J., & Bowers, J. S. (2014, July). The role of the phonological loop in the acquisition of new words in adults. Poster presented at the International Conference of Working Memory, Cambridge, England.
  3. Breitenstein, C., Jansen, A., Deppe, M., Foerster, A-F., Sommer, J., Wolbers, T., & Knecht, S. (2005). Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon. Neuroimage, 25(3), 958-968. doi:10.1016/j.neu- roimage.2004.12.019 · DOI
  4. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic stud- ies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Chee, M. W. L., Soon, C. S., Lee, H. L., & Pallier, C. (2004). Left insula activation: A marker for language attainment in bilinguals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(42), 15265-15270.
  6. Christiner, M., & Reiterer, S. M. (2013). Song and speech: Examining the link between singing talent and speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psychol- ogy (Cognitive Science), 4(874), 1-11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00874 · DOI
  7. Coggins, P. E., Kennedy, T. J., & Armstrong, T. A. (2004). Bilingual corpus collo- sum variability. Brain and Language, 89(1), 69-74. doi:10.1016/S0093- 934X(03)00299-2 · DOI
  8. Conway, A. (2014, July). Process Overlap Theory: A new interpretation of work- ing memory capacity. Paper presented at the International Conference of Working Memory, Cambridge, England.
  9. Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 197-223. doi:10.1007/s10648- 013-9246-y · DOI
  10. De Bot, K. (2006). The plastic bilingual brain: Synaptic pruning or growth? Commen- tary on Green et al. In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The cognitive neuro- science of second language acquisition (pp. 127-132). Oxford: Blackwell.
  11. DeKeyser, R. M., & Koeth, J. (2011). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 395-407). New York: Routledge.
  12. De Zubicaray, G. I., Rose, S. E., & McMahon, K. L. (2011). The structure and con- nectivity of semantic memory in the healthy older adult brain. Neuro- image, 54, 1488-1494. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.058 · DOI
  13. Díaz, B., Baus, C., Escera, C., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Brain po- tentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(42), 16083-16088.
  14. Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012) Individual dif- ferences in late bilinguals' L2 phonological processes: From acoustic-pho- netic analysis to lexical access. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 680-689. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.005 · DOI
  15. Doughty, C. J. (2013). Optimizing post-critical-period language learning. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 153-175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  16. Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems per- spective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). London: Continuum.
  17. Ekman, M., Fiebach, Ch. J., Tittgemeyer, M., & Derrfuss, J. (2014, July). White matter structural network connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts indi- vidual differences in working memory capacity. Poster presented at the International Conference of Working Memory, Cambridge, England.
  18. Fein, D., & Obler, L. K. (1988). Neuropsychological study of talent: A developing field. In L. K. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.), The exceptional brain (pp. 3-15). New York: Guilford.
  19. Flöel, A., de Vries, M. H., Scholz, J., Breitenstein, C., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2009). White matter integrity in the vicinity of Broca's area predicts grammar learning suc- cess. Neuroimage, 47, 1974-1981. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.046 · DOI
  20. Golestani, N. (2012). Brain structural correlates of individual differences at low to high-levels of the language processing hierarchy: A review of new approaches to imaging research. International Journal of Bilingualism. doi:10.1177/13 67006912456585 · DOI
  21. Golestani, N., Molko, N., Dehaene, S., LeBihan, D., & Pallier, C. (2007). Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17(3), 575-582. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk001 · DOI
  22. Golestani, N., Paus, T., & Zatorre, R. J. (2002). Anatomical correlates of learning novel speech sounds. Neuron, 35, 997-1010. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedi- rect.com/science/journal/08966273
  23. Golestani, N., Price, C. J., & Scott, S. K. (2011). Born with an ear for dialects? Structural plasticity in the expert phonetician brain. Journal of Neurosci- ence, 31(11), 4213-4220. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3891-10.2011 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Golestani, N., & Zatorre R. J. (2004). Learning new sounds of speech: Relocation of neural substrates. Neuroimage, 21, 494-506. doi:10.1016/j.neuroima ge.2003.09.071 · DOI
  25. Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 1-14. doi:10.1348/000709904322848798 · DOI
  26. Green, D. W., Crinion, J., & Price, C. P. (2006). Convergence, degeneracy, and control. In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition (pp. 99-125). Oxford: Blackwell.
  27. Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84, 390-405. doi:10.1111/0026-7902 .00076 · DOI
  28. Grogan, A., Green, D. W., Ali, N., Crinion, J. T., & Price, C. J. (2009). Structural correlates of semantic and phonemic fluency ability in first and second languages. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2690-2698. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp023 · DOI
  29. Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2004). Structural brain variation and general intelligence. Neuroimage, 23, 425-433. doi:10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.025 · DOI
  30. Haier, R. J., Siegel, B., MacLachlan, A., Soderling, E., Lottenberg, S., Buchsbaum, M. S. (1992). Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: A positron emission tomographic study, Brain Research, 570, 134-143. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)90573-R Hu, X., Ackermann, H., Martin, J. A., Erb, M., Winkler, S., & Reiterer, S. M. (2013). Language aptitude for pronunciation in advanced second language (L2) Learners: Behavioural predictors and neural substrates. Brain and Lan- guage, 127(3), 366-376. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.006 · DOI
  31. Hu, X., & Reiterer, S. (2009). Personality and pronunciation talent in second language acquisition. In G. Dogil & S. Reiterer (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity. Trends in applied linguistics 1 (pp. 97-130). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  32. Indefrey, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which suggested differences can we trust and what do they mean? In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The cognitive neurosci- ence of second language acquisition (pp. 279-304). Oxford: Blackwell.
  33. Indefrey, P., & Gullberg, M. (2006). Introduction. In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition (pp. 1- 8). Oxford: Blackwell.
  34. Jensen, A. R. (1997). The puzzle of nongenetic variance. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 42-88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Jensen, A. R. (2002). Psychometric g: Definition and substantiation. In R. J. Stern- berg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How gen- eral is it? (pp. 39-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  36. Jordan, C. (2014, July). Music and working memory. Poster presented at the In- ternational Conference of Working Memory, Cambridge, England.
  37. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137-166. doi:10.1017/S0261444810000509 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Kim, K. H., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K. M., & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas asso- ciated with native and second languages. Nature, 388(6638), 171-174.
  39. Lee, H., Devlin, J. T., Shakeshaft, C., Stewart, L. H., Brennan, A., Glensman, J., … & Price, C. J. (2007). Anatomical traces of vocabulary acquisition in the adolescent brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1184-1189. doi:10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.4442-06.2007 · DOI
  40. Linck, J. A., Osthus, P. Koeth, J. T., & Bunting M. F. (2013). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psy- chonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 · DOI
  41. Long, M. H. (2013). Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 3-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  42. Lopez-Barroso, D., de Diego-Balaguer, R., Cunillera, T., Camara, E., Münte, T. F., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2011). Language learning under working memory constraints correlates with microstructural differences in the ventral lan- guage pathway. Cerebral Cortex, 21(12), 2742-2750. doi:10.1093/cercor/ bhr064 Magnetoencephalography. (n.d.). In Psychology dictionary. Retrieved from http://psychologydictionary.org/magnetoencephalography-imegl/ · DOI
  43. Majerus, S., Cowan, N., Péters, F., Van Calster, L., Phillips, Ch., & Schrouff, J. (2014, July). Working memory load effects are predicted by neural patterns associ- ated with attentional load: A machine learning approach. Poster presented at the International Conference of Working Memory, Cambridge, England.
  44. Mechelli, A., Crinion, J. T., Noppeney, U., O'Doherty, J., Ashburner, J., Frackowi- ack, R. S., & Price, C. J. (2004). Neurolinguistics: structural plasticity in the bilingual brain. Nature, 431, 757. doi:10.1038/431757a · DOI · Paper page
  45. Nardo, D., & Reiterer, S. (2009). Musicality and phonetic language aptitude. In G. Dogil & S. Reiterer (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity. Trends in applied linguistics 1 (pp. 213-256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  46. Nauchi, A., & Sakai, K. L. (2009). Greater leftward lateralization of the inferior frontal gyrus in second language learners with higher syntactic abilities. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3625-3635. doi:10.1002/hbm.20790 · DOI
  47. Novoa, L., Fein, D., & Obler, L. K. (1988). Talent in foreign languages: A case study. In L. K. Obler, & D. Fein (Eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychol- ogy of talent and special abilities (pp. 294-302). New York: Guilford.
  48. Obler, L. K. (1989). Exceptional second language learners. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 141-159). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  49. Perani, D. (2005). The neural basis of language talent in bilinguals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 211-213. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.001 · DOI
  50. Perani, D., Abutalebi, J., Paulesu, E., Brambati, S., Scifo, P., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (2003). The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-pro- ficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Map- ping, 19, 170-182. Retrieved from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/jour- nal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193 · DOI
  51. Pereda, E., Reiterer, S. M., & Bhattacharya, J. (2011). Topography of functional connectivity in human multichannel EEG during second language pro- cessing. In J. A. Lozano, J. A. Gómez, & J. A. Moreno (Eds.), Advances in artificial intelligence (pp. 253-262). Heidelberg: Springer.
  52. Plomin, R. (1997). Identifying genes for cognitive abilities and disabilities. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environ- ment (pp. 89-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  53. Postle, B. (2014, July). Revisiting assumptions about the physiological mechanisms underlying the short-term retention of information. Paper presented at the International Conference of Working Memory, Cambridge, England.
  54. Reiterer, S. M. (2009). Brain and language talent: A synopsis. In G. Dogil & S. Reiterer (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity. Trends in applied lin- guistics 1 (pp. 155-191). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  55. Reiterer, S. M., Berger, M. L., Hemmelmann, C., & Rappelsberger, P. (2005). De- creased EEG coherence between prefrontal electrodes: A correlate of high language proficiency? Experimental Brain Research, 163, 109-113. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2215-z · DOI
  56. Reiterer, S. M., Hu, X., Erb, M., Rota, G., Nardo, D., Grodd, W., ... & Ackerman, A. (2011a). Individual differences in audio-vocal speech imitation aptitude in late bilinguals: Functional neuro-imaging and brain morphology. Fron- tiers in Psychology, 2(271), 1-12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00271 · DOI
  57. Reiterer, S. M, Hu, X., Sumathi, T. A., & Singh, N. C. (2013) Are you a good mimic? Neuro-acoustic signatures for speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psy- chology (Cognitive Science), 4(782), 1-13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00782 · DOI
  58. Reiterer, S. M., Pereda, E., & Bhattacharya, J. (2009). Measuring second lan- guage proficiency with EEG synchronization: How functional cortical net- works and hemispheric involvement differ as a function of proficiency level in second language speakers. Journal of Second Language Research, 25(1), 77-106. doi:10.1177/0267658308098997 · DOI
  59. Reiterer, S. M., Pereda, E., & Bhattacharya, J. (2011b). On a possible relationship between linguistic expertise and EEG gamma band phase synchrony. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(334), 1-11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00334 · DOI
  60. Richardson, F. M., Ramsden, S., Ellis, C., Burnett, S., Megnin, O., Catmur, C., . . . & Price, C. J. (2011). Auditory STM capacity correlates with gray matter den- sity in the left posterior STS in cognitively normal and dyslexic adults. Jour- nal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3746-3756. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00060 · DOI
  61. Richardson, F. M., Thomas, M. S. C., Filippi, R., Harth, H., & Price, C. J. (2010). Con- trasting effects of vocabulary knowledge on temporal and parietal brain structure across lifespan. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 943-954. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21238 · DOI
  62. Robinson, P. (2002). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A frame- work for research and pedagogy. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differ- ences and instructed language learning (pp. 113-133). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  63. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-679). Oxford: Blackwell.
  64. Rota, G., & Reiterer, S. M. (2009). Cognitive aspects of pronunciation talent. In G. Dogil & S. Reiterer (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity. Trends in applied linguistics 1 (pp. 67-112). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  65. Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component pro- cess approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293-318). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  66. Schneider, P., Scherg, M., Dosch, H., Specht, H., Gutschalk, A., & Rupp, A. (2002). Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 688-694. doi:10.1038/nn871 · DOI
  67. Schneiderman, E. I., & Desmarais, C. (1988a). The talented language learner: Some preliminary findings. Second Language Research, 4(2), 91-109. doi:10.1177/ 026765838800400201 · DOI
  68. Schneiderman, E. I., & Desmarais, C. (1988b). A neuropsychological substrate for talent in second-language acquisition. In L. K. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.), The exceptional brain. Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 103-126). New York: Guilford.
  69. Schoenemann, P. T., Sheehan, M. J., & Glotzer, L. D. (2005). Prefrontal white matter volume is disproportionately larger in humans than in other pri- mates. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 242-252. doi:10.1038/nn1394 · DOI
  70. Schumann, J. H. (2004a). Introduction. In J. H. Schumann (Ed.), The neurobiology of learning. Perspectives from second language acquisition (pp. 1-21).
  71. Schumann, J. H. (2004b). The neurobiology of aptitude. In J. H. Schumann (Ed.), The neurobiology of learning: Perspectives from second language acquisi- tion (pp. 7-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  72. Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Díaz, B. (2012), First and second language speech per- ception: Graded learning. In L. Roberts & A. Meyer (Eds.), Individual dif- ferences in second language learning [Monograph]. Language Learning, 62(Supplement 2), 131-147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00709.x · DOI · Paper page
  73. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Soriano-Mas, C., Baus, C., Díaz, B., Ressel, V., Pallier, C., … & Pujol, J. (2012). Neuroanatomical markers of individual differences in native and non-native vowel perception. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 150-162. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.11.001 · DOI
  74. Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Indi- vidual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69-95). Philadel- phia: John Benjamins.
  75. Smith, N., Tsimpli, I., Morgan, G., & Woll, B. (2011). The signs of a savant. Lan- guage against the odds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  76. Sparks, R. L., Javorsky, J., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L. (1998). Factors in the pre- diction of achievement and proficiency in a foreign language. Applied Lan- guage Learning, 9(1-2), 72-107.
  77. Stein, M., Federspiel, A., Koenig, T., Wirth, M., Strik, W., Wiest, R., … & Dierks, T. (2012). Structural plasticity in the language system related to increased second language proficiency. Cortex, 48, 458-465. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.10.007 · DOI
  78. Stowe, L. A. (2006). When does the neurological basis of first and second lan- guage processing differ? Commentary on Indefrey. In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition (pp. 305-311). Oxford: Blackwell.
  79. Sutherland, M. E., Zatorre, R. J., Watkins, K. E., Herve, P-Y., Leonard, G., Pike, B.G., ... & Paus, T. (2012). Anatomical correlates of dynamic auditory pro- cessing: Relationship to literacy during early adolescence. NeuroImage, 60, 1287-1295. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.051 · DOI
  80. Van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Looking at second language acquisition from a functional-and structural MRI background. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2293-2298.
  81. Van den Noort, M., Nordby, H., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2005). Understanding second language acquisition: Can structural MRI bring the breakthrough? Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Systems. New Delhi. Retrieved from: www.niitcrcs.com/iccs/papers/2005_24.pdf
  82. Warrier, C., Wong, P., Penhune, V., Zatorre, R., Parrish, T., Abrams, D., & Kraus, N. (2009). Relating structure to function: Heschl's Gyrus and acoustic pro- cessing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(1), 61-69. doi:10.1523/JNEURO- SCI.3489-08.2009 · DOI
  83. Wen, E., & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude: Building and supporting a case for "working memory as language apti- tude". Ilha Do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures and Cultural Studies, 60, 9-34. doi:10.5007/2175-8026. · DOI
  84. Williams, J. N. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 427-441). Oxford: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  85. Wong, F. C. K., Chandrasekaran, B,. Garibaldi, K., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011). White matter anisotropy in the ventral language pathway predicts sound-to- word learning success. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8780-8785. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0999-11.2011 · DOI
  86. Wong, P. C. M., Morgan-Short, K., Ettlinger, M., & Zheng, J. (2012). Linking neu- rogenetics and individual differences in language learning: The dopamine hypothesis. Cortex, 48, 1091-1102. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Wong, P. C. M., Perrachione, T. K., & Parrish, T. B. (2007). Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Hu- man Brain Mapping, 28, 995-1006. doi:10.1002/hbm.20330 · DOI
  88. Wong, P. C. M., Warrier, C. M., Penhune, V. B., Roy, A. K., Sadehh, A., Parrish, T. B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Volume of left Heschl's gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 828-836. doi:10.1093%2Fcercor%2Fbhm115 Wood Bowden, H., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like brain pro- cessing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuro- psychologia, 51, 2492-2511. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.004. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Biedroń, A.
Venue
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
13-40
ISSN
  • 2084-1965
  • 2083-5205
DOI
10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.1.2
Cited by
16
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review