Cited by 112

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Born with an Ear for Dialects? Structural Plasticity in the Expert Phonetician Brain

Golestani, Narly, Price, Cathy J., Scott, Sophie K.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Are experts born with particular predispositions, or are they made through experience? We examined brain structure in expert phoneticians, individuals who are highly trained to analyze and transcribe speech. We found a positive correlation between the size of left pars opercularis and years of phonetic transcription training experience, illustrating how learning may affect brain structure. Phoneticians were also more likely to have multiple or split left transverse gyri in the auditory cortex than nonexpert controls, and the amount of phonetic transcription training did not predict auditory cortex morphology. The transverse gyri are thought to be established in utero ; our results thus suggest that this gross morphological difference may have existed before the onset of phonetic training, and that its presence confers an advantage of sufficient magnitude to affect career choices. These results suggest complementary influences of domain-specific predispositions and experience-dependent brain malleability, influences that likely interact in determining not only how experience shapes the human brain but also why some individuals become engaged by certain fields of expertise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3891-10.2011

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Talented phoneticians tend to have greater amounts of grey matter and white matter in the parietal regions of the left hemisphere of their brains.

    “who investigated brain structure among talented phoneticians and found that they tend to have greater amounts of grey matter and white matter in the parietal regions of the left hemisphere of their brains.”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Golestani, Price & Scott 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beck, 1955, Typologie des gehirns am beispiel des dorsalen menschlichen schlafenappens nebst weiteren beitrage zur frage der links-rechtshirnigkeit, Deutsch Z Nervenheilk, 173, 267, 10.1007/BF00243276 · DOI
  4. 10.1006/nimg.1996.0247 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Buckner, 1995, Dissociation of human prefrontal cortical areas across different speech production tasks and gender groups, J Neurophysiol, 74, 2163, 10.1152/jn.1995.74.5.2163 · DOI
  6. 10.1162/089892900562309 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0093-934X(76)90026-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ana.410010109 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/brain/117.4.671 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/brain/awn137 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:2<79::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  12. 10.1093/cercor/bhg087 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.289.5486.1946 · DOI
  14. Gaser, 2003, Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians, J Neurosci, 23, 9240, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09240.2003 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00285-X · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00800-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/cercor/bhl003 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00862-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/cercor/bhk001 · DOI
  20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2307-05.2005 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.247 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/cercor/8.5.397 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00140.x · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nrn1993 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.003 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00285-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1162/089892904322984571 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/cercor/bhn239 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/cercor/6.5.661 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/hbm.20398 · DOI
  31. Pfeifer, 1920, Myelogenetisch-anatomische Untersuchungen über das kortikale Ende der Hörleitung, Abh Math-Physik Kl sächs Akad Wiss Leipzig, 37, 1
  32. 10.1006/nimg.1999.0441 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1006/brcg.1998.1072 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/brain/119.3.919 · DOI
  35. Rademacher, 2001, Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex, Neuroimage, 13, 669, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0714 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/hbm.20871 · DOI
  37. von Economo, 1930, Uber windungsrelief mabe und Rindenarchitektonic der supratemparalflache, ihre individuellen und seitenunterschiede, Neuropsychiatre, 30, 678
  38. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3489-08.2009 · DOI
  39. Yakovlev PI Lecours AR (1967) Regional development of the brain in early life (Blackwell, Oxford), pp 3–70.
  40. 10.1093/cercor/6.1.21 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Golestani, N., Price, C. J., & Scott, S. K.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-03-16
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
4213-4220
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
112
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review