Cited by 17EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and TeachingSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Transitional woes: On the impact of L2 input continuity from primary to secondary school

Open access
Pfenninger, Simone E., Lendl, Johanna·2017·Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the problem of articulation between levels in the educational system, as the transition from a rather more communicative, contentbased and holistic approach to English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching at primary level to more formal and explicit ways of foreign language (FL) teaching at secondary is often experienced as problematic by students and teachers alike (see, e.g., Muñoz, Tragant, & Camuñas, 2015). The results of a mixed methods analysis are presented, in which we analyzed, through a questionnaire and language experience essays, perceived continuity between input received in primary school and secondary school, as well as learners’ beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy before and after they transitioned to secondary school. Twelve primary schools and six secondary schools in Switzerland participated in the study, with a total of 280 early learners of EFL (biological age 12-13 years, age of onset 8 years). We will argue that one of the main reasons why early FL instruction seems not to bear fruit later in secondary school is that, on the one hand, coherence in curriculum design and practice vary in a few—but crucial—aspects within and between primary schools. On the other hand, the fact that secondary education becomes a meeting point for mixed ability classes also seems to mitigate the potential advantages of an earlier start.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.3.5

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Börner, O., Engel, G., & Groot-Wilken, B. (Eds.). (2013). Hörverstehen -Lesever- stehen -Sprechen. Diagnose und Förderung von sprachlichen Kompeten- zen im Englischunterricht der Primarstufe. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  2. Chaudron, C. (2001). Progress in language classroom research: Evidence from Mod- ern Language Journal, 1916-2000. Modern Language Journal, 85, 57-76.
  3. Ellis, N. C. (2009). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form-focussed learning. In M. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 139-158). Oxford: Blackwell.
  4. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
  5. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York, Routledge.
  6. Johnstone, R. (2009). An early start: What are the key conditions for generalized success? In J. Enever, J. Moon, & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives (pp. 31- 42). Reading: Garnet Education Publishing Ltd.
  7. Milton, J., & Alexiou, T. (2006). Language aptitude development in young learn- ers. In C. Abello-Contesse, R. Chacón-Beltrán, M. D. López-Chiménez, & M. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp. 177-192). Oxford: Peter Lang.
  8. Muñoz, C., Tragant E., & Camuñas M. (2015). Transition: Continuity or a fresh start? APAC Quarterly, 89, 11-16.
  9. Prabhu, N. S. (2009). Teaching English to young learners: The promise and the threat. In J. Enever, J. Moon, & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English lan- guage policy and implementation: international perspectives (pp. 43-44). Reading, UK: Garnet Education Publishing.
  10. Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second lan- guage instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfenninger, S. E., & Lendl, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Salzburg (AT)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Pfenninger, Simone E.
  • Lendl, Johanna
Venue
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Published
2017-09-15
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
443-469
ISSN
  • 2083-5205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2084-1965
OpenAlex
W2762713620
Cited by
17
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pressto (Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
early foreign language teaching, transition to secondary school, English as a foreign language, student self-efficacy, curriculum coherence, mixed-ability classes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review