Cited by 29EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

9. Motivational Perspectives on the Self in SLA: A Developmental View

Ushioda, Ema·2014·Multiple Perspectives on the Self in SLA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21832/9781783091362-010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been little research exploring the interaction between the L2 learning experience and the future selves, and it is an issue that Ushioda (2014: 134) claims is 'undertheorized'.

    “To date, however, there has been little research exploring the interaction between this component and the future selves, and it is an issue that Ushioda (2014: 134) claims is 'undertheorized'.”

    From The motivational dimension of language teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Ushioda (2014)

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ushioda, E.
Corresponding author
Ushioda, Ema
Venue
Multiple Perspectives on the Self in SLA
Published
2014-12-31
Pages
127-141
OpenAlex
W1580324958
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.23
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multilingual Matters eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
self-concept, student motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review