The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does everyone have a price? Understanding people's attitude towards online and offline price discrimination
Open accessAbstract
Does everyone have a price
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Empirical research and anecdotal evidence indicate that discriminatory pricing often meets with resistance from consumers.They generally view the practice as unfair and deem it to be illegitimate (Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019;Turow et al., 2005;Priester et al., 2020).”
From Discrimination grounds and personalised pricing: Consumer perceptions of fairness, norm alignment, legality, and trust in markets (2024) · cites this paper as Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“When asked about their perception of the practice, consumers report high unfairness perceptions; they deem the practice to be unethical and illegitimate (Turow et al., 2005, Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019).”
From Discrimination grounds and personalised pricing: Consumer perceptions of fairness, norm alignment, legality, and trust in markets (2024) · cites this paper as Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our findings are consistent with previous findings and observations that personalised pricing is generally viewed by the public as unfair and illegitimate (Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019;Turow et al., 2005, Priester et al., 2020).”
From Discrimination grounds and personalised pricing: Consumer perceptions of fairness, norm alignment, legality, and trust in markets (2024) · cites this paper as Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, the practice of personalized pricing also sparks a normative and legal debate, primarily focusing on unfairness and whether it should be prohibited (Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019).”
From When is personalized advertising crossing personal boundaries? How type of information, data sharing, and personalized pricing influence consumer perceptions of personalized advertising (2021) · cites this paper as Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research has shown that consumers find such personalized pricing unacceptable (Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019).”
From When is personalized advertising crossing personal boundaries? How type of information, data sharing, and personalized pricing influence consumer perceptions of personalized advertising (2021) · cites this paper as Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, our study suggests that personalized pricing is deemed to be unacceptable, even when it is to the benefit of the receiver, proving the importance of the idea of contextual integrity (Townley et al., 2017;Nissenbaum 2009) and providing new evidence for the idea that people find online personalized pricing inappropriate and unfair (Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019).”
From When is personalized advertising crossing personal boundaries? How type of information, data sharing, and personalized pricing influence consumer perceptions of personalized advertising (2021) · cites this paper as Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, our study suggests that personalized pricing is deemed to be unacceptable, even when it is to the benefit of the receiver, proving the importance of the idea of contextual integrity (Townley et al., 2017;Nissenbaum 2009) and providing new evidence for the idea that people find online personalized pricing inappropriate and unfair (Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019).”
From When is personalized advertising crossing personal boundaries? How type of information, data sharing, and personalized pricing influence consumer perceptions of personalized advertising (2021) · cites this paper as Poort & Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232669 · Cited by 4,042
Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce web sites
Hannak, A., Soeller, G., Lazer, D., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference · doi:10.1145/2663716.2663744 · Cited by 405
Online Price Discrimination and EU Data Privacy Law
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Poort, J. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-017-9354-z · Cited by 213
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Armstrong, 2006, Advances in economics and Econometrics, Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress (Vol. II, 97
- 2016, Regulation on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC
- 2018, Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulations (EC) No 2006/2004 and (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, 1
- Kahneman, 1986, Fairness and the assumptions of economics, Journal of Business, 59, 285, 10.1086/296367 · DOI · Paper page
- Kahneman, 1986, Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market, The American Economic Review, 76, 728
- Mikians, 2013, Crowd-assisted Search for Price Discrimination in e-Commerce: First Results, 1
- Neppelenbroek, 2016, Weekblad Voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat En Registratie, 443
- Odlyzko, 2009, Network neutrality, search neutrality, and the never-ending conflict between efficiency and fairness in markets, Review of Network Economics, 8, 40, 10.2202/1446-9022.1169 · DOI · Paper page
- Pigou, 1932, The economics of welfare
- Steppe, 2017, Online price discrimination and personal data: A General Data Protection Regulation perspective, Computer Law & Security Review, 33, 768, 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.008 · DOI
- Stigler, 1987, Theory of price
- Turow, 2005, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of
- J., 2009, Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities That Enable It
- Valentino-Devries, 2012, Websites vary prices, deals based on users’ information, Wall Street Journal
- H.R, 1989, Handbook of Industrial Organization (Vol. 1, 597
- VissersT.NikiforakisN.BielovaN.JoosenW.Crying wolf? On the price discrimination of online airline ticketsPresented at the7th Workshop on Hot Topics in Privacy Enhancing Technologies (HotPETs 2014https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01081034/documentfrom2014
- Zuiderveen Borgesius, 2015, Online Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law, 10.2139/ssrn.2652665 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Bol, N. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100144 · Cited by 80
Heidary, K., van der Rest, J.-P., & Custers, B. (2024) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2024.4.1809 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Poort, J., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- ORCID
- Poort, Joost
- Venue
- Internet Policy Review
- Published
- 2019-01-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2197-6775 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921024282
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Internet Policy Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Law › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
- Keywords
- price discrimination, consumer attitudes, consumer privacy, personal data, data-driven pricing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does everyone have a price? Understanding people's attitude towards online and offline price discrimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14763/2019.1.1383
- The paper
- Poort, J., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2019). Does everyone have a price? Understanding people's attitude towards online and offline price discrimination. Internet Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.1.1383
