CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 76

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital commons

Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie, Stalder, Felix·2020·Internet Policy Review
DOI 10.14763/2020.4.1530
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14763/2020.4.1530

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, 162, 1243, 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
  2. MertonR.K.The Normative Structure of ScienceThe Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical InvestigationsUniversity of Chicago Press
  3. Coase, The Lighthouse in Economics, The Journal of Law and Economics, 17, 357, 10.1086/466796 · DOI
  4. Woodmansee, The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the “Author”, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 17, 425, 10.2307/2738129 · DOI
  5. Hettinger, Justifying Intellectual Property, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 18, 31
  6. Woodmansee, On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 10, 279
  7. Hardin, The tragedy of the unmanaged commons, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 199, 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90097-3 · DOI
  8. Boyle, A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?, Duke Law Journal, 47, 87, 10.2307/1372861 · DOI
  9. Benkler, Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm, The Yale Law Journal, 112, 369, 10.2307/1562247 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Söderberg, Copyleft vs. Copyright: A Marxist Critique, First Monday, 7, 10.5210/fm.v7i3.938 · DOI
  11. O’Mahony, Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work, Research Policy, 32, 1179, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00048-9 · DOI
  12. Dutfield, The innovation dilemma: intellectual property and the historical legacy of cumulative creativity, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 370
  13. Elkin-Koren, What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitating a Creative Commons, Fordham Law Review, 74, 375
  14. Katz, Pitfalls of open licensing: An analysis of Creative Commons licensing, IDEA, The Intellectual Property Law Review, 46, 391
  15. Benkler, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, 10.12987/9780300127232 · DOI
  16. Guadamuz, Open science: open source licences for scientific research, North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, 7, 321
  17. Dusollier, Sharing Access to Intellectual Property through Private Ordering, Chicago Kent Law Review, 82, 1391
  18. Berry, Copy, rip, burn: the politics of copyleft and open source, 10.2307/j.ctt183q67g · DOI
  19. Boyle, The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind, 10.12987/9780300142754 · DOI
  20. Linebaugh, The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all, 10.1525/9780520932708 · DOI
  21. Chen, To surpass or to conform – what are public licenses for?, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2009, 107
  22. O’Neil, Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and authority in online tribes, 10.2307/j.ctt183pc3c · DOI
  23. Chen, Collaborative Authorship: From Folklore to the Wikborg, Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, 2011, 131
  24. Dulong de RosnayM.Access to digital collections of public domain works: Enclosure of the commons managed by libraries and museums”Proceedings of the 13th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons (IASCHyderabad, Indiahttps://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00671628
  25. Hess, Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, 10.7551/mitpress/6980.001.0001 · DOI
  26. Mazzone, Copyfraud and other abuses of intellectual property law, 10.1515/9780804779159 · DOI
  27. Bates, “This is what modern deregulation looks like” : co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK’s Open Government Data Initiative, Journal of Community Informatics, 8, 10.15353/joci.v8i2.3038 · DOI
  28. Dulong de Rosnay, The Digital Public Domain: Foundations for an Open Culture, 10.11647/OBP.0019 · DOI
  29. Postigo, The digital rights movement: the role of technology in subverting digital copyright, 10.7551/mitpress/8698.001.0001 · DOI
  30. Rainie, Networked: The new social operating system, 10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001 · DOI
  31. Schweik, Internet success: A study of open-source software commons, 10.7551/mitpress/9780262017251.001.0001 · DOI
  32. Tkacz, From open source to open government : a critique of open politics, Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 12, 386
  33. Fuchs, The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious, TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11, 428, 10.31269/triplec.v11i2.502 · DOI
  34. GrayJ.Towards a Genealogy of Open DataGlasgow10.2139/ssrn.2605828
  35. Landemore, Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment, Journal of Political Philosophy, 23, 10.1111/jopp.12032 · DOI
  36. Vines, The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age, Current Biology, 24, 94, 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Borch, Urban Commons: Rethinking the City, 10.4324/9781315780597 · DOI
  38. Morozov, Socialize the Data Centres!, New Left Review
  39. SadiM.H.DaiJ.YuE.Designing Software Ecosystems: How to Develop Sustainable Collaborations?: Scenarios from Apple iOS and Google AndroidAdvanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops
  40. Schöpf, The Commodification of the Couch: A Dialectical Analysis of Hospitality Exchange Platforms., TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 13, 10.31269/triplec.v13i1.480 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Vercellone, From the Crisis to the ’Welfare of the Common’ as a New Mode of Production, Theory, Culture & Society, 32, 85
  42. Dulong de Rosnay, Peer to party: Occupy the law, First Monday, 21
  43. Gordon, Civic media: Technology, design, practice, 10.7551/mitpress/9970.001.0001 · DOI
  44. Powell, Network exceptionalism: online action, discourse and the opposition to SOPA and ACTA, Information, Communication & Society, 19, 249, 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1061572 · DOI
  45. Suber, Knowledge unbound: Selected writings on open access, 2002-2011, 10.7551/mitpress/8479.001.0001 · DOI
  46. Birkinshaw, Reflections on open strategy, Long Range Planning, 50, 423, 10.1016/j.lrp.2016.11.004 · DOI
  47. Broumas, Social Democratic and Critical Theories of the Intellectual Commons: A Critical Analysis., TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15, 100, 10.31269/triplec.v15i1.783 · DOI
  48. Dulong de Rosnay, Public artworks and the freedom of panorama controversy: a case of Wikimedia influence, Internet Policy Review, 6, 10.14763/2017.1.447 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Birkinbine, Commons Praxis: Toward a Critical Political Economy of the Digital Commons, TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16, 290, 10.31269/triplec.v16i1.929 · DOI
  50. Dobusch, Open strategy-making with crowds and communities: Comparing Wikimedia and Creative Commons, Long Range Planning, 51, 561, 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.08.005 · DOI
  51. Horton, The simple but ingenious system Taiwan uses to crowdsource its laws, MIT Technology Review
  52. Larivière, Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?, Nature, 562, 483, 10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w · DOI
  53. Normand, Is Diamond Open Access the Future of Open Access?, The IJournal: Graduate Student Journal of the Faculty of Information, 3
  54. Morozov, Digital Socialism?, New Left Review, 33
  55. Saez-Trumper, Online Disinformation and the Role of Wikipedia, arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 76

Metadata

Authors
Dulong de Rosnay, M., & Stalder, F.
Venue
Internet Policy Review
Publisher
Internet Policy Review, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
Published
2020-12-17
Volume
9
Issue
4
ISSN
2197-6775
DOI
10.14763/2020.4.1530
Cited by
76
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital commons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14763/2020.4.1530
The paper
Dulong de Rosnay, M., & Stalder, F. (2020). Digital commons. Internet Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530