CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data justice

Dencik, Lina, Sanchez-Monedero, Javier·2022·Internet Policy Review
DOI 10.14763/2022.1.1615
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14763/2022.1.1615

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Fraser, Abnormal Justice, Critical Inquiry, 34, 393, 10.1086/589478 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andrejevic, The Big Data Divide, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673
  3. De Stefano, Negotiating the algorithm”: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection, Employment, Working Paper
  4. Dencik, Surveillance Realism and the Politics of Imagination: Is There No Alternative?, Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 31
  5. Floridi, What is data ethics?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 374
  6. Gürses, Engineering Privacy by Design Reloaded, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, 21
  7. Grossman, A Case for Data Commons: Towards Data Science as a Service, arXiv:1604.02608 [cs] · arXiv
  8. Metcalfe, The politics of big borders: Data (in)justice and the governance of refugees, First Monday, 24
  9. Vera, When data justice and environmental justice meet: formulating a response to extractive logic through environmental data justice, Information, Communication & Society, 22, 1012, 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1596293 · DOI
  10. Savage, DWP urged to reveal algorithm that ‘targets’ disabled for benefit fraud, The Guardian
  11. Morozov, After the Facebook scandal it’s time to base the digital economy on public v private ownership of data’, The Guardian
  12. Moore, Humans and Machines at Work: Monitoring, Surveillance and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism, 10.1007/978-3-319-58232-0 · DOI
  13. Johnson, The question of information justice, Commun. ACM, 59, 27, 10.1145/2879878 · DOI
  14. Jansen, Media and social justice, 10.1057/9780230119796 · DOI
  15. Gangadharan, Decentering technology in discourse on discrimination, Information, Communication & Society, 22, 882, 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1593484 · DOI
  16. Gandy Jr., The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information, 10.1093/oso/9780197579411.001.0001 · DOI
  17. Fourcade, Seeing like a market, Socioecon Rev, mww033
  18. Van Dijck, Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology, SS, 12, 197, 10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dencik, Exploring Data Justice: Conceptions, Applications and Directions, Information, Communication & Society, 22, 873, 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268 · DOI · Paper page
  20. DencikLinaTowards Data Justice Unionism? A Labour Perspective on AI GovernanceAI for Everyone? Critical PerspectivesUniversity of Westminster Press801202210.16997/book55.ohttps://www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk/site/chapters/e/10.16997/book55.o/ · DOI
  21. Delacroix, Bottom-up data Trusts: disturbing the ‘one size fits all’ approach to data governance, International Data Privacy Law, ipz014
  22. CouldryN.Keynote at Applying the Capabilities Approach to Media and CommunicationsPraguehttps://cdn.ymaws.com/www.icahdq.org/resource/resmgr/conference/2018/preconferences/pc_capabilities.pdf
  23. Costanza-Chock, Design justice: community-led practices to build the worlds we need, 10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001 · DOI
  24. Jensen, A theory of communication and justice, 10.4324/9781315751207 · DOI
  25. Boyd, Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon, Information, Communication & Society, 15, 662, 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Benjamin, Race after technology: abolitionist tools for the new Jim code, 10.1093/sf/soz162 · DOI
  27. AndrejevicM.Keynote plenary at the conference ‘Surveillance and Citizenship’: Digital Citizenship and the Surveillance SocietyUnited Kingdom
  28. Taylor, Constructing commercial data ethics, Regulation & Technology, 1
  29. Gandy, A Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information, 10.1093/oso/9780197579411.001.0001 · DOI
  30. KulynychBogdanOverdorfRebekahTroncosoCarmelaGürsesSedaPOTs: protective optimization technologiesProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and TransparencyACMBarcelona Spain701202210.1145/3351095.3372853https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3351095.3372853 · DOI
  31. Connolly, Why computing belongs within the social sciences, Commun. ACM, 63, 54, 10.1145/3383444 · DOI
  32. SelbstAndrew D.BoydDanahFriedlerSorelle A.VenkatasubramanianSureshVertesiJanetFairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical SystemsProceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and TransparencyACMAtlanta GA USA701202210.1145/3287560.3287598https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3287560.3287598 · DOI
  33. Hooker, Moving beyond “algorithmic bias is a data problem”, Patterns, 2, 100241, 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100241 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Musikanski, Artificial Intelligence and Community Well-being: A Proposal for an Emerging Area of Research, Int. Journal of Com. WB, 3, 39, 10.1007/s42413-019-00054-6 · DOI
  35. Dencik, Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism, Big Data & Society, 3, 205395171667967, 10.1177/2053951716679678 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Dencik, L., & Sanchez-Monedero, J.
Venue
Internet Policy Review
Publisher
Internet Policy Review, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
Published
2022-01-14
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2197-6775
DOI
10.14763/2022.1.1615
Cited by
55
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review