The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From "think like a vertex" to "think like a graph"
Abstract
To meet the challenge of processing rapidly growing graph and network data created by modern applications, a number of distributed graph processing systems have emerged, such as Pregel and GraphLab. All these systems divide input graphs into partitions, and employ a "think like a vertex" programming model to support iterative graph computation. This vertex-centric model is easy to program and has been proved useful for many graph algorithms. However, this model hides the partitioning information from the users, thus prevents many algorithm-specific optimizations. This often results in longer execution time due to excessive network messages (e.g. in Pregel) or heavy scheduling overhead to ensure data consistency (e.g. in GraphLab). To address this limitation, we propose a new "think like a graph" programming paradigm. Under this graph-centric model, the partition structure is opened up to the users, and can be utilized so that communication within a partition can bypass the heavy message passing or scheduling machinery. We implemented this model in a new system, called Giraph++, based on Apache Giraph, an open source implementation of Pregel. We explore the applicability of the graph-centric model to three categories of graph algorithms, and demonstrate its flexibility and superior performance, especially on well-partitioned data. For example, on a web graph with 118 million vertices and 855 million edges, the graph-centric version of connected component detection algorithm runs 63X faster and uses 204X fewer network messages than its vertex-centric counterpart.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters
Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327492 · Cited by 18,476
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment
Kleinberg, J. M. (1999) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/324133.324140 · Cited by 8,959
A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs
Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827595287997 · Cited by 5,762
Pregel: a system for large-scale graph processing
Malewicz, G., Austern, M. H., Bik, A. J. C., Dehnert, J. C., Horn, I., Leiser, N., & Czajkowski, G. (2010) · Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1807167.1807184 · Cited by 3,515
Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.025102 · Cited by 2,093
Distributed GraphLab: a framework for machine learning and data mining in the cloud
Low, Y., Bickson, D., Gonzalez, J., Guestrin, C., Kyrola, A., & Hellerstein, J. M. (2012) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/2212351.2212354 · Cited by 1,653
PowerGraph: distributed graph-parallel computation on natural graphs
Gonzalez, J. E., Low, Y., Gu, H., Bickson, D., & Guestrin, C. (2012) · doi:10.5555/2387880.2387883 · Cited by 1,451
The webgraph framework I: compression techniques
Boldi, P., & Vigna, S. (2004) · Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/988672.988752 · Cited by 1,201
Gropp, W., & Lusk, E. (2001) · Beowulf Cluster Computing with Linux · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1556.003.0013 · Cited by 1,124
Cited by
A scalable processing-in-memory accelerator for parallel graph processing
Ahn, J., Hong, S., Yoo, S., Mutlu, O., & Choi, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/2749469.2750386 · Cited by 767
Processing data where it makes sense: Enabling in-memory computation
Mutlu, O., Ghose, S., Gómez-Luna, J., & Ausavarungnirun, R. (2019) · Microprocessors and Microsystems · doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2019.01.009 · Cited by 300
McCune, R. R., Weninger, T., & Madey, G. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2818185 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, Y., Balmin, A., Corsten, S. A., Tatikonda, S., & McPherson, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-204
- ISSN
- 2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W217817341
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 40.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From "think like a vertex" to "think like a graph". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14778/2732232.2732238
- The paper
- Tian, Y., Balmin, A., Corsten, S. A., Tatikonda, S., & McPherson, J. (2013). From "think like a vertex" to "think like a graph". Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. https://doi.org/10.14778/2732232.2732238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.