CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of gastric emptying to the glycemic and insulinemic responses to a 75-g oral glucose load in older subjects with normal and impaired glucose tolerance

Trahair, Laurence G., Horowitz, Michael, Marathe, Chinmay S., Lange, Kylie, Standfield, Scott, Rayner, Christopher K., Jones, Karen L.·2014·Physiological Reports
DOI 10.14814/phy2.12204PMC PMC4255811
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14814/phy2.12204

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Blood glucose (A), serum insulin (B), plasma GLP‐1 (C), and plasma GIP (D) immediately before and after a 75‐g oral glucose load in all subjects (▲, n = 77), subjects with normal glucose tolerance (●, n = 31) and those with impaired glucose tolerance (± impaired fasting glucose) (■, n = 46) (*P < 0.05 NGT vs. IGT).
Figure 1. Blood glucose (A), serum insulin (B), plasma GLP‐1 (C), and plasma GIP (D) immediately before and after a 75‐g oral glucose load in all subjects (▲, n = 77), subjects with normal glucose tolerance (●, n = 31) and those with impaired glucose tolerance (± impaired fasting glucose) (■, n = 46) (*P < 0.05 NGT vs. IGT).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Relationships between the rise in blood glucose between t = 0–60 min and the T50 in (A) all subjects (n = 74, R = −0.30, P < 0.01), (B) NGT (●, n = 30, R = 0.10, P = NS) and IGT (■, n = 44, R = −0.47, P < 0.001).
Figure 2. Relationships between the rise in blood glucose between t = 0–60 min and the T50 in (A) all subjects (n = 74, R = −0.30, P < 0.01), (B) NGT (●, n = 30, R = 0.10, P = NS) and IGT (■, n = 44, R = −0.47, P < 0.001).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Relationships between absolute blood glucose at t = 120 min and the T50 in (A) all subjects (n = 74, R = 0.01, P = NS) and (B) NGT (n = 30, R = 0.34, P = 0.06) and between blood glucose AUC 0–120 min and the T50 in (C) IGT (n = 44, R = −0.34, P < 0.05).
Figure 3. Relationships between absolute blood glucose at t = 120 min and the T50 in (A) all subjects (n = 74, R = 0.01, P = NS) and (B) NGT (n = 30, R = 0.34, P = 0.06) and between blood glucose AUC 0–120 min and the T50 in (C) IGT (n = 44, R = −0.34, P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Relationships between the change from baseline for blood glucose between t = 0–180 min and the T50 in (A) all subjects (n = 74, R = 0.55, P < 0.001), (B) NGT group (n = 30, R = 0.73, P < 0.001), and (C) the IGT group (n = 44, R = 0.50, P < 0.001).
Figure 4. Relationships between the change from baseline for blood glucose between t = 0–180 min and the T50 in (A) all subjects (n = 74, R = 0.55, P < 0.001), (B) NGT group (n = 30, R = 0.73, P < 0.001), and (C) the IGT group (n = 44, R = 0.50, P < 0.001).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Abdul-Ghani, 2008, One-hour plasma glucose concentration and the metabolic syndrome identify subjects at high risk for future type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Care, 31, 1650, 10.2337/dc08-0225 · DOI
  2. Abdul-Ghani, 2009, Fasting versus postload plasma glucose concentration and the risk for future type 2 diabetes: results from the Botnia Study, Diabetes Care, 32, 281, 10.2337/dc08-1264 · DOI
  3. Abdul-Ghani, 2010, The shape of plasma glucose concentration curve during OGTT predicts future risk of type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., 26, 280, 10.1002/dmrr.1084 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Alberti, 1998, Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation, Diabet. Med., 15, 539, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  5. American Diabetes A, 2014, Standards of medical care in diabetes-2014, Diabetes Care, 37, S14, 10.2337/dc14-S014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bardini, 2010, Inflammation markers and metabolic characteristics of subjects with 1-h plasma glucose levels, Diabetes Care, 33, 411, 10.2337/dc09-1342 · DOI
  7. Brener, 1983, Regulation of the gastric emptying of glucose, Gastroenterology, 85, 76, 10.1016/S0016-5085(83)80232-7 · DOI
  8. Chang, 2006, Impaired beta-cell function in human aging: response to nicotinic acid-induced insulin resistance, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 91, 3303, 10.1210/jc.2006-0913 · DOI
  9. Collins, 1983, Gastric emptying in normal subjects-a reproducible technique using a single scintillation camera and computer system, Gut, 24, 1117, 10.1136/gut.24.12.1117 · DOI
  10. Corvilain, 1995, Effect of short-term starvation on gastric emptying in humans: relationship to oral glucose tolerance, Am. J. Physiol., 269, G512
  11. Fraser, 1990, Hyperglycaemia slows gastric emptying in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, Diabetologia, 33, 675, 10.1007/BF00400569 · DOI
  12. Ghoos, 1993, Measurement of gastric emptying rate of solids by means of a carbon-labeled octanoic acid breath test, Gastroenterology, 104, 1640, 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90640-X · DOI
  13. Horowitz, 1984, Changes in gastric emptying rates with age, Clin. Sci. (Lond.), 67, 213, 10.1042/cs0670213 · DOI
  14. Horowitz, 2001, Gastroparesis: prevalence, clinical significance and treatment, Can. J. Gastroenterol., 15, 805, 10.1155/2001/628102 · DOI
  15. Jones, 1995, Relationships between gastric emptying, intragastric meal distribution and blood glucose concentrations in diabetes mellitus, J. Nucl. Med., 36, 2220
  16. Kim, 2012, Glucose response curve and type 2 diabetes risk in Latino adolescents, Diabetes Care, 35, 1925, 10.2337/dc11-2476 · DOI
  17. Korosi, 2001, Effect of aging and diabetes on the enteroinsular axis, J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 56, M575, 10.1093/gerona/56.9.M575 · DOI
  18. Ma, 2012, Effects of variations in duodenal glucose load on glycaemic, insulin, and incretin responses in type 2 diabetes, Diabet. Med., 29, 604, 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03496.x · DOI
  19. Matsuda, 1999, Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp, Diabetes Care, 22, 1462, 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1462 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Moore, 1983, Effect of age on gastric emptying of liquid-solid meals in man, Dig. Dis. Sci., 28, 340, 10.1007/BF01324951 · DOI
  21. Nauck, 2004, Gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, Diabetes, 53, S190, 10.2337/diabetes.53.suppl_3.S190 · DOI · Paper page
  22. O'Donovan, 2005, Effect of aging on transpyloric flow, gastric emptying, and intragastric distribution in healthy humans-impact on glycemia, Dig. Dis. Sci., 50, 671, 10.1007/s10620-005-2555-3 · DOI
  23. Phillips, 1992, Rapid gastric emptying of an oral glucose solution in type 2 diabetic patients, J. Nucl. Med., 33, 1496
  24. Phillips, 1997, Accelerated gastric emptying in hypertensive subjects, J. Nucl. Med., 38, 207
  25. Pilichiewicz, 2007, Load-dependent effects of duodenal glucose on glycemia, gastrointestinal hormones, antropyloroduodenal motility, and energy intake in healthy men, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., 293, E743, 10.1152/ajpendo.00159.2007 · DOI
  26. Reaven, 1993, Insulin resistance and insulin secretion are determinants of oral glucose tolerance in normal individuals, Diabetes, 42, 1324, 10.2337/diab.42.9.1324 · DOI
  27. Schwartz, 1995, Gastric emptying in Mexican Americans compared to non-Hispanic whites, Dig. Dis. Sci., 40, 624, 10.1007/BF02064382 · DOI
  28. Stevens, 2011, Measurement of gastric emptying of a high-nutrient liquid by 3D ultrasonography in diabetic gastroparesis, Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 23, 220, 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01630.x · DOI
  29. Toft-Nielsen, 2001, Determinants of the effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 in type 2 diabetes, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 86, 3853, 10.1210/jcem.86.8.7743 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Trahair, 2012, Comparative effects of variations in duodenal glucose load on glycemic, insulinemic, and incretin responses in healthy young and older subjects, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 97, 844, 10.1210/jc.2011-2583 · DOI
  31. Vilsboll, 2003, Both GLP-1 and GIP are insulinotropic at basal and postprandial glucose levels and contribute nearly equally to the incretin effect of a meal in healthy subjects, Regul. Pept., 114, 115, 10.1016/S0167-0115(03)00111-3 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wishart, 1992, Radioimmunoassay of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in plasma, Clin. Chem., 38, 2156, 10.1093/clinchem/38.10.2156 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Trahair, L. G., Horowitz, M., Marathe, C. S., Lange, K., Standfield, S., Rayner, C. K., & Jones, K. L.
Affiliations
Discipline of Medicine; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide South Australia Australia
Venue
Physiological Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
e12204
ISSN
2051-817X
DOI
10.14814/phy2.12204
PMC
PMC4255811
Cited by
22
References
7
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review