Cited by 6Indian and Buddhist StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Forbidden Women. A Peculiar Buddhist Reference

Open access
Silk, Jonathan A.·2008·Silk Road Studies

Abstract

When dealing with allowable relations, Indian legal literature concerns itself both with restrictions on whom one may marry, and on those with whom one may have sex.While normative Indian Buddhist literature has virtually no explicit interest in the former category, it does preserve stipulations regarding the latter, at least one of which is framed in particularly interesting terms.The Da!"ku!alakarmapatha, of uncertain date (attributed apocryphally to the poet A!vagho"a, otherwise to Ati!a), 1 is available in a Sanskrit fragment, in two Tibetan translations, one in prose and one in verse, and in Chinese.Tacitly assuming, like virtually all such literature, the male standpoint, it offers a brief passage listing those whom one may not approach sexually: 2 agamy# 1 n#ma sarv# parastr$ dharmadhvaj# gotrarak"it# gr% h$tapa&y# ve!y# kr$tisambandhin$ tiryañca!ceti eva' svavanit#m 2 api sevayan k#mamithy#c#r$ bhavati 1) Lévi prints the manuscript as agamyo (similarly, a few lines above read agamy"!for agamya!). 2) Lévi reads svavatit"m.The corresponding Tibetan prose translation reads: 3 'gro bar 1 bya ba ma yin pa ni | gzhan gyi bud med thams cad dang | chos kyi 2 rgyal mtshan dang rigs kyis bsrungs pa dang | rgyal pos bsrungs pa dang | gzhan gyis blangs pa'i smad 'tshong ma dang | gnyen 'brel can dang | byol song ngo || de ltar rang gi chung ma la brten 3 nas 'dod pas log par g.yem par 'gyur ro || 1) Pek.5355 bgrod par 2) Pek.5355, D dang 3) Pek.5396 (perhaps better): la'ang bsten.1 See Cordier 1905: Mdo XXXI.21,XXXIII.19,XXXIII.39,XCIV.23.Mochizuki in Mochizuki and Kanno 1996 gives special attention to the question of authorship, tentatively concluding from a variety of evidence that the Da!"ku!alakarmapatha predates Ati!a, but cannot be the work of the poet A!vagho"a either, and thus is to be attributed to some, so far unknown, third author.2 Lévi 1929: 269.The text is translated with notes in Mochizuki and Kanno 1996. 3 Peking Tanjur 5355, dbu ma, ki 357b2-4 = 5396, dbu ma, gi 40a8-b2 = Derge Tanjur 3958, dbu ma, khi 307a7-b1.Trivial variants are ignored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1484/m.srs-eb.4.2017020

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bühler, Georg. 1879. The Sacred Law of the +ryas: As Taught in the Schools of +pastamba, Gautama, V"sistha, and Baudh"yana. Part 1: +pastamba and Gautama. The Sacred Books of the East 2 (Oxford: The Clarendon Press).
  2. ---. 1932. +pastamba's Aphorisms on The Sacred Laws of the Hindus. Third edition. Bombay Sanskrit Series 44 and 50 (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute).
  3. Jolly, Julius. 1880. The Insitutes of Vishnu. The Sacred Books of the East 7 (Oxford: The Clarendon Press. Reprinted: Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1965).
  4. ---. 1969. The Kau,il%ya Artha!"stra. Part I: A critical edition with a glossary. Second edition (Bombay: University of Bombay; reprint: Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1986).
  5. Lévi, Sylvain. 1929. "Autour d'A!vagho"a." Journal Asiatique 215/2: 255-285.
  6. Olivelle, Patrick. 1999. Dharmas,tras: The Law Codes of +pastambha, Gautama, Baudh"yana and Vasi#,ha (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  7. Sternbach, Ludwig. 1951. "Legal Position of Prostitutes According to Kau)ilya's Artha!#stra." Journal of the American Oriental Society 71/1: 25-60.
  8. ---. 1965. Juridical Studies in Ancient Indian Law. Part I (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass). Study Group on Buddhist Sanskrit Literature. 2006. Bonbun Yuimaky-: Potaraky* shoz- shahon ni motozuku k-tei 梵文維 摩經-ポタラ 宮所蔵写 本 に基づく校 訂 / Vimalak%rtinirde!a: A Sanskrit Edition based upon the Manuscript Newly Found at the Potala Palace (Tokyo: Taisho University Press).

Metadata

Authors
Silk, J. A.
Corresponding author
Silk, Jonathan A.
Venue
Silk Road Studies
Published
2008-01
Pages
371-378
ISSN
  • 1782-6225 (ISSN-L)
  • 2566-008X
OpenAlex
W2102429959
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
28.52
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Silk Road studies (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Keywords
sexual prohibitions, marriage restrictions, gender relations, Sanskrit Buddhist texts, Tibetan translation, authorship attribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review