Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of influenza exposure on rates of hospital admissions and physician visits because of respiratory illness among pregnant women

Open access
Dodds, L., McNeil, S. A., Fell, D. B., Allen, V. M., Coombs, A., Scott, J., MacDonald, N.·2007·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excess deaths have occurred among pregnant women during influenza pandemics, but the impact of influenza during nonpandemic years is unclear. We evaluated the impact of exposure during nonpandemic influenza seasons on the rates of hospital admissions and physician visits because of respiratory illness among pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a 13-year (1990-2002) population-based cohort study involving pregnant women in Nova Scotia. We compared rates of hospital admissions and physician office visits because of respiratory illness during the influenza season in each trimester of pregnancy with rates during the influenza season in the year before pregnancy and with rates in non-influenza seasons. Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 134,188 pregnant women in the study cohort, 510 (0.4%) were admitted to hospital because of a respiratory illness during pregnancy and 33,775 (25.2%) visited their physician for the same reason during pregnancy. During the influenza seasons, the rate ratio of hospital admissions in the third trimester compared with admissions in the year before pregnancy was 7.9 (95% CI 5.0-12.5) among women with comorbidities and 5.1 (95% CI 3.6-7.3) among those without comorbidities. The rate of hospital admissions in the third trimester among women without comorbidities was 7.4 per 10,000 woman-months during the influenza season, compared with 5.4 and 3.1 per 10,000 woman-months during the peri-and non-influenza seasons respectively. Corresponding rates among women with comorbidities were 44.9, 9.3 and 18.9 per 10,000 woman-months. Only 6.7% of women with comorbidities had received influenza immunization. INTERPRETATION: Our data support the recommendation that pregnant women with comorbidities should receive influenza vaccination regardless of their stage of pregnancy during the influenza season. Since hospital admissions because of respiratory illness during the influenza season were also increased among pregnant women without comorbidities, all pregnant women are likely to benefit from influenza vaccination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.061435

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Dodds, L., McNeil, S. A., Fell, D. B., Allen, V. M., Coombs, A., Scott, J., & MacDonald, N.
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2007-02-13
Volume
176
Issue
4
Pages
463-468
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2140283795
Cited by
462
References
31
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of influenza exposure on rates of hospital admissions and physician visits because of respiratory illness among pregnant women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.061435
The paper
Dodds, L., McNeil, S. A., Fell, D. B., Allen, V. M., Coombs, A., Scott, J., & MacDonald, N. (2007). Impact of influenza exposure on rates of hospital admissions and physician visits because of respiratory illness among pregnant women. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.061435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.