The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone may increase the incidence of fractures. We aimed to determine systematically the risk of fractures associated with thiazolidinedione therapy and to evaluate the effect of the therapy on bone density. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), other trial registries and product information sheets through June 2008. We selected long-term (> or = 1 year) randomized controlled trials involving patients with type 2 diabetes and controlled observational studies that described the risk of fractures or changes in bone density with thiazolidinediones. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) for fractures and the weighted mean difference in bone density. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 10 randomized controlled trials involving 13 715 participants and from 2 observational studies involving 31 679 participants. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were associated with a significantly increased risk of fractures overall in the 10 randomized controlled trials (OR 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.79; p < 0.001). Five randomized controlled trials showed a significantly increased risk of fractures among women (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.65-3.01; p < 0.001) but not among men (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.39; p = 0.98). The 2 observational studies demonstrated an increased risk of fractures associated with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. Bone mineral density in women exposed to thiazolidinediones was significantly reduced at the lumbar spine (weighted mean difference -1.11%, 95% CI -2.08% to -0.14%; p = 0.02) and hip (weighted mean difference -1.24%, 95%CI -2.34% to -0.67%; p < 0.001) in 2 randomized controlled trials. INTERPRETATION: Long-term thiazolidinedione use doubles the risk of fractures among women with type 2 diabetes, without a significant increase in risk of fractures among men with type 2 diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular Causes
Nissen, S. E., & Wolski, K. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072761 · Cited by 4,675
Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy
Kahn, S. E., Haffner, S. M., Heise, M. A., Herman, W. H., Holman, R. R., Jones, N. P., Kravitz, B. G., Lachin, J. M., O'Neill, M. C., Zinman, B., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa066224 · Cited by 2,962
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect
Cook, R. J., & Sackett, D. L. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452 · Cited by 1,885
Rosenberg, M. S. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.x · Cited by 1,285 · cited 2×
“, the number of additional negative trials that would be required to reverse a significant finding in the meta-analysis).(19) We calculated the number needed to harm by applying the pooled OR from the meta-analysis to the control event rate in different populations.”
BackgroundMethodMuch ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events
Bradburn, M. J., Deeks, J. J., Berlin, J. A., & Russell Localio, A. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2528 · Cited by 938
Rosiglitazone-Associated Fractures in Type 2 Diabetes
Kahn, S. E., Zinman, B., Lachin, J. M., Haffner, S. M., Herman, W. H., Holman, R. R., Kravitz, B. G., Yu, D., Heise, M. A., Aftring, R. P., et al. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-2270 · Cited by 537
Thiazolidinediones and Heart Failure
Singh, S., Loke, Y. K., & Furberg, C. D. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-0141 · Cited by 262
Self-citationSimpson's paradox and calculation of number needed to treat from meta-analysis
Cates, C. J. (2002) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-2-1 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Chatterjee, S., Khunti, K., & Davies, M. J. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30058-2 · Cited by 2,577
Mechanisms of diabetes mellitus-induced bone fragility
On behalf of the IOF Bone and Diabetes Working Group, Napoli, N., Chandran, M., Pierroz, D. D., Abrahamsen, B., Schwartz, A. V., & Ferrari, S. L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.153 · Cited by 1,107
Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2019
Araki, E., Goto, A., Kondo, T., Noda, M., Noto, H., Origasa, H., Osawa, H., Taguchi, A., Tanizawa, Y., Tobe, K., et al. (2020) · Diabetology International · doi:10.1007/s13340-020-00439-5 · Cited by 545
In Vivo Assessment of Bone Quality in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes
Farr, J. N., Drake, M. T., Amin, S., Melton, L. J., McCready, L. K., & Khosla, S. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.2106 · Cited by 499
Pharmacology and therapeutic implications of current drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Tahrani, A. A., Barnett, A. H., & Bailey, C. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.86 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Loke, Y. K., Singh, S., & Furberg, C. D.
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Joule Inc.
- Published
- 2009-01-06
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-39
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- OpenAlex
- W2154580171
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.080486
- The paper
- Loke, Y. K., Singh, S., & Furberg, C. D. (2009). Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.