Cited by 393Gastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsNosocomial Infections in ICU

Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Eom, C.-S., Jeon, C. Y., Lim, J.-W., Cho, E.-G., Park, S. M., Lee, K.-S.·2011·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have yielded inconsistent findings about the association between the use of acid-suppressive drugs and the risk of pneumonia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize this association. METHODS: We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Embase and the Cochrane Library) from inception to Aug. 28, 2009. Two evaluators independently extracted data. Because of heterogeneity, we used random-effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates of effect. RESULTS: We identified 31 studies: five case-control studies, three cohort studies and 23 randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis of the eight observational studies showed that the overall risk of pneumonia was higher among people using proton pump inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.46, I(2) 90.5%) and histamine(2) receptor antagonists (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36, I(2) 0.0%). In the randomized controlled trials, use of histamine(2) receptor antagonists was associated with an elevated risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia (relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.48, I(2) 30.6%). INTERPRETATION: Use of a proton pump inhibitor or histamine(2) receptor antagonist may be associated with an increased risk of both community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Given these potential adverse effects, clinicians should use caution in prescribing acid-suppressive drugs for patients at risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.092129

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of obser- vational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta- analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.
  2. Nardino RJ, Vender RJ, Herbert PN. Overuse of acid-suppres- sive theraphy in hospitalized patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3118-22.
  3. Wilder-Smith CH, Merki HS. Tolerance during dosing with H 2 - receptor antag onists. An overview. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1992; 193:14-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eom, C.-S., Jeon, C. Y., Lim, J.-W., Cho, E.-G., Park, S. M., & Lee, K.-S.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2010-12-20
Volume
183
Issue
3
Pages
310-319
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2105534233
Cited by
393
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 30
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
acid-suppressive drugs, proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists, pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, community-acquired pneumonia, drug safety, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Antacids, Anti-Ulcer Agents, Cross Infection, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Histamine H2 Antagonists, Humans, Pneumonia, Community-Acquired Infections, Proton Pump Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review