Cited by 115Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and Access

Deployment-related mental disorders among Canadian Forces personnel deployed in support of the mission in Afghanistan, 2001–2008

Open access
Boulos, David, Zamorski, Mark A.·2013·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The conflict in Afghanistan has exposed more Canadian Forces personnel to a greater degree of adversity than at any time in recent memory. We determined the incidence of Afghanistan deployment-related mental disorders and associated risk factors among personnel previously deployed in support of this mission. METHODS: The study population consisted of 30,513 Canadian Forces personnel who began a deployment in support of the mission in Afghanistan before Jan. 1, 2009. The primary outcome was a mental disorder perceived by a Canadian Forces clinician to be related to the Afghanistan deployment. Data on diagnoses and perceptions were abstracted from medical records of a stratified random sample of 2014 personnel. Sample design weights were used in all analyses to generate descriptive statistics for the entire study population. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1364 days, 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1%-14.8%) of the study population had a mental disorder that was attributed to the Afghanistan deployment. Posttraumatic stress disorder was the most common diagnosis (in 8.0%, 95% CI 7.0%-9.0%, of personnel). Deployment to higher-threat locations, service in the Canadian Army and lower rank were independent risk factors associated with an Afghanistan-related diagnosis (e.g., hazard ratio for deployment to Kandahar Province 5.6, 95% CI 2.6-12.5, relative to deployment to the United Arab Emirates). In contrast, sex, Reserve Forces status, multiple deployments and deployment length were not independent risk factors. INTERPRETATION: An important minority of Canadian Forces personnel deployed in support of the Afghanistan mission had a diagnosis of a mental disorder perceived to be related to the deployment. Determining long-term outcomes is an important next step.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.122120

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant relationship has been identified between traumatic events during deployment and mental disorders and suicide.

    “a significant relationship was identified between traumatic events during deployment and mental disorders and suicide.6,21,22”

    From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Research section describes combat exposure as a strong predictor of postdeployment mental disorders and reports higher rates of PTSD and other mental disorders among personnel exposed to heavy combat. It does not report a relationship between traumatic events during deployment and suicide; the reference mentioning suicide concerns adverse childhood experiences, not deployment. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons; 1977.
  2. Cassell DL. Bootstrap mania!: re-sampling the SAS way [paper no. 268-2010]. In: Proceedings of the SAS Global Forum 2010 Conference. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
  3. Smith TC, Ryan MA, Wingard DL, et al. New onset and persis- tent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder self reported after deployment and combat exposures: prospective population based US military cohort study. BMJ 2008;336:366-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boulos, D., & Zamorski, M. A.
Affiliations
Canadian Armed Forces (CA)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2013-07-02
Volume
185
Issue
11
Pages
E545-E552
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2099278635
Cited by
115
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11
FWCI
13.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, Afghanistan deployment, military personnel, risk factors, Kandahar province, Canadian Army, military mental health, incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Canada, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Warfare, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Risk Assessment, Young Adult, Afghan Campaign 2001-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review