Cited by 515Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingAccounting and Financial ManagementSustainable Development and Environmental Policy

Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting

Open access
Schaltegger, Stefan, Wagner, Marcus·2006·International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation

Abstract

Sustainability performance management is a newly emerging term which addresses the social, environmental and economic (performance) aspects of corporate management in general and of corporate sustainability management in particular.The management of sustainability performance requires a sound management framework which firstly links environmental and social management with the business and competitive strategy and management and, secondly, that integrates environmental and social information with economic business information and sustainability reporting.This contribution addresses the link between the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard as a strategic information and management approach, sustainability accounting as a supporting measurement approach and sustainability reporting for communication and reporting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijaape.2006.010098

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Diaz Guerrero, A., Möller, D. and Wagner, M. (2002) 'Sustainability balanced scorecard in der Flughafen Hamburg GmbH', in Schaltegger, S. and Dyllick, T. (Eds.): Nachhaltig managen mit der Balanced Scorecard, Gabler, Wiesbaden, German, pp.229-258.
  2. Elkington, J., Kreander, N. and Stibbard, H. (1998) 'The third international survery on company environmental reporting: the 1997 benchmark survey', Greener Management International, Vol. 21, pp.99-111.
  3. Future, e.V. and IÖW (Eds.) (1998) Umweltberichte und Umwelterklärungen: Ranking 1998. Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse und Trends, future e.V., Munich.
  4. Hofstetter, P. and Heijungs, R. (1996) Definitions of Terms and Symbols, in Udo de Haes, H. (Ed.): Towards a Methodology for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, SETAC Europe, Brussels, pp.31-39.
  5. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2004) Strategy Maps, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  6. Mcnaghten, P., Grove-White, R., Jacobs, M. and Wynne, B. (1997) Sustainability and Indicators, in McDondagh, P. and Protero, A. (Eds.): Green Management, A Reader, Dryden Press, London, pp.148-153.
  7. Neely, A. (1993) Performance Measurement System Design. A Process-based Approach, Manufacturing Engineering Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  8. Olve, N-G., Roy, J. and Wetter, M. (1999) Performance Drivers, Wiley, Chichester.
  9. Schaltegger, S. and Dyllick, T. (Eds.) (2002) Nachhaltig managen mit der Balanced Scorecard. Konzepte und Fallstudien, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
  10. Sharman, R. (2003) 'Risk management at the crossroads', Management Quarterly, January, Reprinted in: PAIB Articles of Merit 2004, pp.27-32.
  11. Srikanthan, S. (2002) 'Success through strategic management accounting', Management Quarterly, January; Reprinted in: PAIB Articles of Merit 2003, pp.53-59.
  12. Wagner, M. and Schaltegger, S. (2003) 'How does sustainability performance relate to and business competitiveness?', Greener Management International, Winter, Vol. 44, pp.5-16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation
Published
2006
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 1740-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-8016
OpenAlex
W2005635348
Cited by
515
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
20.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Accounting Auditing and Performance Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Financial Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Keywords
sustainability performance, sustainability measurement, sustainability reporting, integrative management, corporate sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review