Cited by 4Water Resource Management and QualityWater Governance and InfrastructureGender, Education, and Development Issues

Gender relations and water management in different eco-cultural contexts in Northern Thailand.

Open access
Lebel, Louis, Lebel, Phimphakan, Sriyasak, Patcharawalai, Ratanawilailak, Songphonsak, Bastakoti, Ram C., Bastakoti, Geeta B.·2015·International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology

Abstract

This paper assessed water management by households from three ethnic groups in two contrasting ecological settings (upland and lowland) in the Upper Ping River Basin in Northern Thailand. Important gender differences in the use and management of water were identified. Women are major users of water for agriculture in the uplands, but less so in the lowlands. In the lowlands irrigation is viewed as a masculine activity. In the uplands the role of women is more widely accepted, with women frequently being members of water user groups. Men, however, dominate 'decision-making' positions in community-based and state-led water organisations in both upland and lowland areas. Perceptions of contributions to daily tasks, and behavioural traits important to governance roles, differed between men and women, and sometimes also across eco-cultural contexts, underlining the complexity of factors influencing gender relations in water governance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijarge.2015.074096

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both men and women in Hmong communities in Vietnam agreed that women were likely to be listened to when they participated in water management meetings.

    “Both men and women in Hmong communities in Vietnam agreed that women were likely to be listened to when they participated in water management meetings [97].”
  • Women leveraged social support to assume public roles, including taking public water management roles, disseminating WASH knowledge as community facilitators, becoming masons and water technicians, establishing water enterprises, participating in WASH activities and operating WASH businesses, attending trainings on cistern building, and gaining water user association membership.

    “Women leveraged social support to assume public roles.Women needed or sought family support to take public water management roles (Vietnam [97]), disseminate water and sanitation knowledge as community facilitators (Costa Rica [63]), become masons and water technicians (Nepal [121]), establish water enterprises (Cambodia [30]), participate in WASH activities and operate WASH businesses (Indonesia”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lebel, L., Lebel, P., Sriyasak, P., Ratanawilailak, S., Bastakoti, R. C., & Bastakoti, G. B.
Affiliations
Chiang Mai University (TH)
Venue
International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology
Published
2015
Volume
11
Issue
3/4
Pages
228
ISSN
  • 1462-4605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-5004
OpenAlex
W2291368499
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Keywords
gender relations, water management, water governance, women in agriculture, irrigation, water user associations, gender division of labor, northern Thailand, ethnic groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review