The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration
Abstract
Corporate research and development (R&D) and knowledge networks of large and small firms are responding to widespread availability of talent and diverse knowledge. Much of this dispersed knowledge arises from entrepreneurial activity, originating in universities, research institutes and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Three important approaches have been introduced recently to understand R&D strategy in the context of global or metanational networks: open innovation, knowledge integration and a double network structure. The contribution of this paper is to analyse these approaches as affecting and affected by the presence of regional innovative ecosystems and their attraction as locations of R&D. This suggests a simultaneous need for local and global, as well as internal and external, knowledge integration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the existing literature pays very little attention to the role of the sustainable entrepreneur in entrepreneurial ecosystems (Bischoff & Volkmann, 2018; Fichter et al., 2016; Malecki, 2011).”
From Sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an emerging field of research (2021) · cites this paper as Malecki, 2011
In the citing paper
“Many entrepreneurial ventures are part of the plat -form economy ( Thomas et al., 2014) and innovation ecosystems ( Autio & Thomas, 2014; Scaringella & Radziwon, 2018) and therefore require global links beyond the dense localized networks within the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem (Malecki, 2011).”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Malecki, 2011
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
(2003) · Cited by 9,368
National Systems of Innovation
Lundvall, B., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., Gjerding, A. N., Gelsing, L., Gregersen, B., Christensen, J. L., Freeman, C., Dalum, B., Fagerberg, J., et al. (2010) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.7135/upo9781843318903 · Cited by 6,114
National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis
Nelson, R. R. (1993) · Cited by 4,853
The Rise of the Creative Class
Florida, R. L. (2002) · Cited by 4,537
Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa · Cited by 4,478
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim010030027 · Cited by 3,299
Christensen, C. M. (2011) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800642816 · Cited by 2,917
Sectoral systems of innovation and production
Malerba, F. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 · Cited by 2,733
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 · Cited by 2,571
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 148 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique
Stam, E. (2015) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · Cited by 2,406
Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements
Stam, E., & de Ven, A. V. (2019) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6 · Cited by 1,622
Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8 · Cited by 977
(2014) · Cited by 950
Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 · Cited by 852
Metadata
- Authors
- Malecki, E. J.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Malecki, Edward J.
- ORCID
- Malecki, Edward J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36
- ISSN
- 1368-275X (ISSN-L)
- 1741-5098
- OpenAlex
- W2117884508
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 148
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
- Keywords
- open innovation, double network, knowledge integration, entrepreneurial ecosystems, regional innovation ecosystems, global innovation networks, R&D strategy, small and medium-sized enterprises, university-industry collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
