The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pose estimation of an uncooperative spacecraft from actual space imagery
Abstract
This paper addresses the preliminary design of a spaceborne monocular vision-based navigation system for on-orbit-servicing and formation-flying applications. The aim is to estimate the pose of a passive space resident object using its known three-dimensional model and single low-resolution two-dimensional images collected on-board the active spacecraft. In contrast to previous work, no supportive means are available on the target satellite (e.g., light emitting diodes) and no a-priori knowledge of the relative position and attitude is available (i.e., lost-in-space scenario). Three fundamental mechanisms – perceptual organisation, true perspective projection, and random sample consensus – are exploited to overcome the limitations of monocular passive optical navigation in space. The preliminary design is conducted and validated making use of actual images collected in the frame of the PRISMA mission at about 700 km altitude and 10 m inter-spacecraft separation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The HIL images of SPEED+ involve a half-scale mockup model of the Tango spacecraft from the PRISMA mission [17,18].”
From SPEED+: Next-Generation Dataset for Spacecraft Pose Estimation across Domain Gap (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“To the best of the authors' knowledge, the only publicly available benchmark dataset on spacecraft pose estimation with fully labeled images from multiple sources is the Spacecraft PosE Estimation Dataset (SPEED) [16] which consists of 15,300 images of the Tango spacecraft from the PRISMA mission [17, 18].”
From SPEED+: Next-Generation Dataset for Spacecraft Pose Estimation across Domain Gap (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“To the best of the authors' knowledge, the only publicly available benchmark dataset on spacecraft pose estimation with fully labeled images from multiple sources is the Spacecraft PosE Estimation Dataset (SPEED) [16] which consists of 15,300 images of the Tango spacecraft from the PRISMA mission [17, 18].”
From SPEED+: Next-Generation Dataset for Spacecraft Pose Estimation across Domain Gap (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, it did not prove to be robust with respect to the spacecraft symmetry.”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“but it lacked of robustness to illumination and background conditions.”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Its method was tested with the PRISMA image dataset and proved to be flexible with respect to the spacecraft shape”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“D'Amico et al. [15] used the same feature detection and extraction methods in [13] in combination with a Low-Pass Filter (LPF).”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Also, the limited amount of realistic space images available in [15], [24] and [9] could not represent all the 450 challenging orbital scenarios for which a specific camera-target-Sun-Earth geometry would affect the pose estimation accuracy.”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“In particular, this architecture shows improvements with respect to previous IP and pose estimation techniques [15,11,10].”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“SPNv2 is also evaluated on prisma25 which contains 25 labeled spaceborne images of Tango acquired during the rendezvous phase of the PRISMA mission (D'Amico et al., 2013, 2014).”
From Robust multi-task learning and online refinement for spacecraft pose estimation across domain gap (2024) · cites this paper as D'Amico et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“The SPEED+ [22] dataset comprises images of the Tango spacecraft from the PRISMA [49] mission, consisting of three distinct domains, i.e., synthetic, lightbox, and sunlamp.”
From Bridging the Domain Gap in Satellite Pose Estimation: A Self-Training Approach Based on Geometrical Constraints (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Use of the hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures
Duda, R. O., & Hart, P. E. (1972) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/361237.361242 · Cited by 6,633
MLESAC: A New Robust Estimator with Application to Estimating Image Geometry
Torr, P. H. S., & Zisserman, A. (2000) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.1999.0832 · Cited by 2,402
Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images
Lowe, D. G. (1987) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(87)90070-1 · Cited by 1,283
Model-based object pose in 25 lines of code
Dementhon, D. F., & Davis, L. S. (1995) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf01450852 · Cited by 1,034
Perceptual organization and visual recognition
(1985) · Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0734-189x(85)90041-6 · Cited by 1,033
Spaceborne Autonomous Formation-Flying Experiment on the PRISMA Mission
D'Amico, S., Ardaens, J.-S., & Larsson, R. (2012) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.55638 · Cited by 173
Self-citationFlight Dynamics Challenges of the German On-Orbit Servicing Mission DEOS
Rupp, T., Boge, T., Kiehling, R., & Sellmaier, F. (2009) · elib (German Aerospace Center) · Cited by 67
Prisma Formation Flying Demonstrator: Overview and Conclusions from the Nominal Mission
Bodin, P., Noteborn, R., Larsson, R., Karlsson, T., D’Amico, S., Ardaens, J.-S., Delpech, M., & Bergès, J. (2012) · elib (German Aerospace Center) · Cited by 58
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–132 of 132
Tecchia, C., Piccinin, M., Nocerino, A., Opromolla, R., & Hillenbrand, U. (2025) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2025-1416 · Cited by 2
Zhu, Q., Lu, Y., Li, P., Li, J., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2026.01.024 · Cited by 2
Maleki, S., Raman, A., Cheng, Y., Crassidis, J. L., & Schmid, M. (2023) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.g007301 · Cited by 2
Uncooperative Spacecraft Pose Estimation With Normalized Segmentation Coordinate Space
Zhong, L., Chen, S., Wang, W., Yang, W., Yuan, G., Guo, P., Yang, X., & Zhang, X. (2024) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2024.3442570 · Cited by 2
Multi-Head Self-Attention-Incorporated YOLOv5s for Satellites Detection
Liu, Y., Wang, W., Ye, R., Ren, Y., Wang, L., & Pang, W. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3490376 · Cited by 2
Zhou, Y., Ma, G., Li, W., Wei, S., Chen, C., & Zhang, W. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3556287 · Cited by 2
Uncertainty-Aware Knowledge Distillation for Compact and Efficient 6DoF Pose Estimation
Ousalah, N. A., Kacem, A., Ghorbel, E., Koumandakis, E., & Aouada, D. (2025) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros60139.2025.11245982 · Cited by 2
Problem of angular motion control of a non-cooperative on-orbit service object
Fokov, A. A., & Savchuk, O. P. (2021) · Technical mechanics · doi:10.15407/itm2021.01.037 · Cited by 1
Silvestrini, S., Cassinis, L. P., Hinz, R., González-Arjona, D., Tipaldi, M., Visconti, P., Corradino, F., Pesce, V., & Colagrossi, A. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90916-7.00015-9 · Cited by 1
RELATIVE MOTION PARAMETERS ESTIMATION OF A NON-COOPERATIVE SPACECRAFT FROM VISUAL INFORMATION
Salnikov, N. N., Мельничук, С. В., Gubarev, V. F., Maksymyuk, L. V., & Shevchenko, V. N. (2023) · Kosmìčna nauka ì tehnologìâ · doi:10.15407/knit2023.03.016 · Cited by 1
Non-cooperative Satellite Rotation Estimation Based on Monocular Vision
He, J., Yi, J., & Xu, L. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications Technology and Computer Science (ACCTCS) · doi:10.1109/acctcs61748.2024.00056 · Cited by 1
Review of Relative Navigation for Noncooperative Spacecraft in Close Range
Wang, D., Hu, Q., Li, W., Hu, H., & Zhang, K. (2020) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8458-9_81 · Cited by 1
Real-time robust motion tracking using 3D point cloud for space debris removal
Hirano, D., & Kato, H. (2016) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero.2016.7500598
SoftPOSIT enhancements for monocular camera spacecraft pose estimation
Shi, J.-F., & Ulrich, S. (2016) · International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics · doi:10.1109/mmar.2016.7575083
Resilient Machine Learning in Space Systems: Pose Estimation as a Case Study
Khadka, A., Sthapit, S., Epiphaniou, G., & Maple, C. R. (2022) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero53065.2022.9843671
Electro-optical-based relative navigation for close-proximity operations
Opromolla, R. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824541-5.00009-1
Kodukula, A., Jana, S., Shukla, S., Bera, T., Das, K., & Ghose, D. (2024) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-0327-2_7
Two Stage Non-Linear Pose estimation of Non-Cooperative satellites using Deep Keypoint Detection
Reddy, V. S., & Rajendran, S. (2024) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt61001.2024.10724479
Li, J., & Ning, X. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16224259
Sajjad, N., Price, A., Mirshams, M., & Salzmann, M. (2024) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.12.034
Ye, H., Zhang, G., Wang, F., Cao, J., Jie, J., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.578603
Ousalah, N. A., Rostami, P., Kacem, A., Ghorbel, E., Koumandakis, E., & Aouada, D. (2025) · IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) · doi:10.1109/mmsp64401.2025.11324192
Huang, Z., & Bing, Q. (2025) · International Conference on Mechatronic Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (MEAI) · doi:10.1109/meai68126.2025.11406681
E3S-Net: an efficient end-to-end 6D pose estimation method for non-cooperative space target
Shen, N., & Wang, J. (2026) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ae6ba8
Yang, H., Huang, J., Ren, H., Sun, H., & Tian, R. (2026) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2026.115074
Towards Robust 6D Pose Tracking for On-Orbit-Servicing with Learned Segmentation and Motion Priors
Reichert, A. E., Ulmer, M., Piccinin, M., Eklund, D. F., Haglund, H., Schenk, D., Durner, M., & Triebel, R. (2026) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero66936.2026.11519910
3DGS-based 3D Reconstruction of Noncooperative Targets and Analysis of Observational Factors
Zhu, Q., Yao, L. U., Xuefeng, T. A. O., Zhu, X., Hongxiang, L. U. O., & ZHANG, Y. (2026) · Manned Spaceflight · doi:10.3724/zrht.1674-5825.2026016
融合多任务学习与混合域自适应的端到端空间目标位姿估计方法(特邀)
Shengli, 刘. L., Chunguang, L., Zhen, 闫. Y., & Yutian, 武. W. (2026) · Laser & Optoelectronics Progress · doi:10.3788/lop260996
极端空间环境下物理约束引导的航天器模糊补偿与位姿估计(特邀)
Hao, 叶. Y., Yudi, 赵. Z., Feng, 王. W., Jianzhong, 曹. C., & Gaopeng, 张. Z. (2026) · Laser & Optoelectronics Progress · doi:10.3788/lop260884
Guerazem, S., Rondao, D., & Aouf, N. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2026.3731320
Xin, Z. E. N. G., Hairong, C. H. U., Wu, G., Miao, X. U., Zhang, D., Yuan, Y., Lang, Y. A. N. G., & Liu, P. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2026.104514
Towards Robust Learning-Based Pose Estimation of Noncooperative Spacecraft
Park, T. H., Sharma, S., & D'Amico, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.00392 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- D', S., Amico, N. A., Benn, M., & Jørgensen, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- DTU Space (DK)
- Venue
- International Journal of Space Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171
- ISSN
- 2048-8459 (ISSN-L)
- 2048-8467
- OpenAlex
- W2594388292
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Space Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
- Keywords
- pose estimation, on-orbit servicing, formation flying, perceptual organization, perspective projection, RANSAC, PRISMA mission, spaceborne imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review