Cited by 173Spacecraft Dynamics and ControlSpace Satellite Systems and ControlSpacecraft Design and Technology

Spaceborne Autonomous Formation-Flying Experiment on the PRISMA Mission

D'Amico, S., Ardaens, J.-S., Larsson, R.·2012·Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics

Abstract

The Prototype Research Instruments and Space Mission Technology Advancement (PRISMA) represents the first \nEuropean technology demonstration of formation-flying and on-orbit-servicing techniques. Several hardware and \nsoftware experiments, either at subsystem or system levels, have been successfully conducted since the launch of the \ndual-satellite mission in June 2010. This paper describes the guidance, navigation, and control functionalities and \npresents key flight results from the so-called Spaceborne Autonomous Formation-Flying Experiment (SAFE) \nexecuted in September 2010 and March 2011 as one of the primary PRISMA mission objectives. SAFE is intended to \ndemonstrate autonomous acquisition, keeping, and reconfiguration of passive relative orbits for advanced remotesensing \nand rendezvous applications. As shown in the paper, the onboard Global Positioning System navigation \nsystem provides relative orbit information in real time with an accuracy better than 10 cm and 1 mm=s (threedimensional, \nroot mean square) in position and velocity, respectively. The impulsive formation control achieves \naccuracies better than 10m(three-dimensional, root mean square) for separations below 2 km with minimum usage \nof thrusters, ensuring high predictability for simplified mission operations and minimum collision risk for increased \nsafety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/1.55638

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ESA & Stanford benchmark dataset (SPEED) contains both synthetic and real images of a mockup model of one satellite used in a flight mission, named PRISMA.

    “The latter contains both synthetic and real images with 1920 × 1200 px, generated in [29], of a mockup model of one satellite used in a flight mission, named PRISMA [44].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Amico, S., Ardaens, J.-S., & Larsson, R.
Affiliations
  • DLR, German Aerospace Center, 82234 Wessling, Germany
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • OHB Sweden, 171 22 Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
Venue
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
Published
2012-05
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
834-850
ISSN
  • 0731-5090 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3884
OpenAlex
W2146931989
Cited by
173
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
PRISMA mission, on-orbit servicing, relative orbit determination, satellite rendezvous, guidance, navigation and control, collision avoidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review