Cited by 64Technology Adoption and User BehaviourEducational Technology and E-LearningOnline and Blended Learning

Acceptance of learning management system in university students: an integrating framework of modified UTAUT2 and TTF theories

Sharif, Arshian, Afshan, Sahar, Qureshi, Muhammad Asif·2019·International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the unused (behavioural and technological) scopes of learning management system acceptance by succeeding an extra inclusive method to address learning management intention adoption. CFA and SEM analyses have been used to examine the data gathered from university students. The study attempts to investigate the part of technological variables in explaining behavioural intention of individuals to adopt learning management by integrating two pre-established frameworks of UTAUT2 (modified) and TTF. The empirical outcomes proven the significant impact of task (TAC) and technology characteristics (TEC) in simplifying task technology fit (TTF). The outcomes of this study also support the significant relationship of task technology fit (TTF) and facilitating condition (FC) with intention to adopt learning management system. The current study offers an all-inclusive method to explain the acceptance of learning management system by joining two recognised theories of technology acceptance. The strength of current study is based on combining behavioural and technological features of learning management system. The explanatory power of our research model suggests the very best explanatory power that described 60.1% of the behavioural intention to adopt learning management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijtel.2019.098810

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TTF model has been widely researched to examine the adoption of technology in areas like healthcare, big data, banking and finance, and training management systems.

    “The TTF model has been widely researched to examine the adoption of technology in areas like healthcare, big data, banking and finance, and training management systems (Tam and Oliveira, 2016; Sharif et al., 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Qureshi, M. A.
Affiliations
Universiti Utara Malaysia (MY)
Venue
International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning
Published
2019
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
201
ISSN
  • 1753-5255 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-5263
OpenAlex
W4231912669
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
virtual learning environments, technology acceptance, UTAUT2, task-technology fit, adoption intention, university students, facilitating conditions, technology characteristics, task characteristics, theoretical integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review