The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing organisational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field
Abstract
Since organisational knowledge is at the crux of sustainable competitive advantage, the burgeoning field of intellectual capital is an exciting area for both researchers and practitioners. Intellectual capital is conceptualised from numerous disciplines making the field a mosaic of perspectives. Accountants are interested in how to measure it on the balance sheet, information technologists want to codify it on systems, sociologists want to balance power with it, psychologists want to develop minds because of it, human resource managers want to calculate an ROI on it, and training and development officers want to make sure that they can build it. The following article represents a comprehensive literature review from a variety of managerial disciplines. In addition to highlighting the research to date, avenues for future pursuit are also offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146
Cited by
Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models
Bontis, N. (1998) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251749810204142 · Cited by 3,276
Self-citationAssessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital
Bontis, N. (2001) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00053 · Cited by 1,689
Self-citationThe Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms
Chen, Y.-S. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9349-1 · Cited by 889
Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation
Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691930210435570 · Cited by 830
Intellectual capital ROI: a causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents
Bontis, N., & Fitz‐enz, J. (2002) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691930210435589 · Cited by 801
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bontis, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology Management
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5/6/7/8
- Pages
- 433
- ISSN
- 0267-5730 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-5276
- OpenAlex
- W1516987016
- Cited by
- 1,007
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 47.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing organisational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1504/ijtm.1999.002780
- The paper
- Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organisational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.1999.002780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.