Contradictory perceptions on corporate social responsibility practices in the Brazilian tobacco industry
Abstract
Brazil hosts the main tobacco cluster in the world. Through an integrated production system, tobacco companies have been important to the development of the region and have used corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices along the production chain to respond to the criticism of their product. This paper seeks to identify the contradictions in CSR practices in the tobacco industry in Brazil. We interviewed 16 people who represent the main organisations in Brazil's tobacco industry, organising their perceptions into three groups: 'pro-tobacco industry', 'pro-tobacco growers', and 'pro-public health'. The results show that CSR practices are considered as effective means to legitimise this sector, minimising the tobacco industry's negative image and generating support for its permanence in the market. The discussion of the controversy regarding CSR activities contributes to the understanding of the practices employed and provides a glimpse into the future of tobacco farming in Brazil and other developing countries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The tobacco industry uses CSR for image laundering, to gain political capital and to stymie regulatory processes.
“The tobacco industry uses CSR for image laundering, to gain political capital and to stymie regulatory processes.41–43”
From Role of stakeholders in Nigeria’s tobacco control journey after the FCTC: lessons for tobacco control advocacy in low-income and middle-income countries (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Egbe, C. O., Bialous, S. A., & Glantz, S. (2019) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054344 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bossle, M. B., Neutzling, D. M., Wegner, D., Trevisan, M., Knorst, M., & Nascimento, L. F. M. D.
- Affiliations
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Venue
- Latin American J. of Management for Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3/4
- Pages
- 193
- ISSN
- 2052-0336 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-0344
- OpenAlex
- W2230589820
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Latin American J of Management for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- corporate social responsibility, tobacco industry, tobacco cultivation, tobacco farmers, stakeholder perspectives, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review