Multihoming in Two-Sided Markets: An Empirical Inquiry in the Video Game Console Industry
Abstract
Two-sided markets are composed of platform owners and two distinct user networks that either buy or sell applications for the platform. The authors focus on multihoming—the choice of an agent in a user network to use more than one platform. In the context of the video game console industry, they examine the conditions affecting seller-level multihoming decisions on a given platform. Furthermore, they investigate how platform-level multihoming of applications affects the sales of the platform. The authors show that increased platform-level multihoming of applications hurts platform sales, a finding consistent with literature on brand differentiation, but they also show that this effect vanishes as platforms mature or gain market share. The authors find that platform-level multihoming of applications affects platform sales more strongly than the number of applications. Furthermore, among mature platforms, an increasing market share leads to more seller-level multihoming, while among nascent platforms, seller-level multihoming decreases as platform market share increases. These findings prompt scholars to look beyond network size in analyzing two-sided markets and provide guidance to both (application) sellers and platform owners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on complementor multihoming has largely been conducted in mature platform contexts where platform dynamics have been reduced to interactions between two dominant platforms, leading to a one-off multihoming decision with only one multihoming option.
“research on complementor multihoming has largely been conducted in mature platform contexts where platform dynamics have been reduced to the interactions between two dominant platforms; consequently, complementors face a one-off multihoming decision with only one multihoming option”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Landsman and Stremersch 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 214
- Authors
- Landsman, V., & Stremersch, S.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- IESE Business School (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Landsman, Vardit
- Stremersch, Stefan
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 39-54
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1965286165
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Keywords
- multihoming, two-sided markets, brand differentiation, network effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review