Cited by 214Digital Platforms and EconomicsConsumer Market Behavior and PricingDigital Games and Media

Multihoming in Two-Sided Markets: An Empirical Inquiry in the Video Game Console Industry

Landsman, Vardit, Stremersch, Stefan·2011·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Two-sided markets are composed of platform owners and two distinct user networks that either buy or sell applications for the platform. The authors focus on multihoming—the choice of an agent in a user network to use more than one platform. In the context of the video game console industry, they examine the conditions affecting seller-level multihoming decisions on a given platform. Furthermore, they investigate how platform-level multihoming of applications affects the sales of the platform. The authors show that increased platform-level multihoming of applications hurts platform sales, a finding consistent with literature on brand differentiation, but they also show that this effect vanishes as platforms mature or gain market share. The authors find that platform-level multihoming of applications affects platform sales more strongly than the number of applications. Furthermore, among mature platforms, an increasing market share leads to more seller-level multihoming, while among nascent platforms, seller-level multihoming decreases as platform market share increases. These findings prompt scholars to look beyond network size in analyzing two-sided markets and provide guidance to both (application) sellers and platform owners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jm.09.0199

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on complementor multihoming has largely been conducted in mature platform contexts where platform dynamics have been reduced to interactions between two dominant platforms, leading to a one-off multihoming decision with only one multihoming option.

    “research on complementor multihoming has largely been conducted in mature platform contexts where platform dynamics have been reduced to the interactions between two dominant platforms; consequently, complementors face a one-off multihoming decision with only one multihoming option”

    From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Landsman and Stremersch 2011

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 49 · Cited by 214

Authors
Landsman, V., & Stremersch, S.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • IESE Business School (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Landsman, Vardit
  • Stremersch, Stefan
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2011-11
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
39-54
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W1965286165
Cited by
214
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9
FWCI
18.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
multihoming, two-sided markets, brand differentiation, network effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review