The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Positive and Negative Online Customer Reviews: Do Brand Strength and Category Maturity Matter?
Abstract
Research has shown brand equity to moderate the relationship between online customer reviews (OCRs) and sales in both the emerging Blu-ray and mature DVD player categories. Positive (negative) OCRs increase (decrease) the sales of models of weak brands (i.e., brands without significant positive brand equity). In contrast, OCRs have no significant impact on the sales of the models of strong brands, although these models do receive a significant sales boost from their greater brand equity. Higher sales lead to a larger number of positive OCRs, and increased positive OCRs aid a brand's transition from weak to strong. This creates a positive feedback loop between sales and positive OCRs for models of weak brands that not only helps their sales but also increases overall brand equity, benefiting all models of the brand. In contrast to the view that brands matter less in the presence of OCRs, we find that OCRs matter less in the presence of strong brands. Positive OCRs function differently than marketing communications in that their effect is greater for weak brands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data
Mundlak, Y. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913646 · Cited by 5,412
Panel data and unobservable individual effects
Hausman, J., & Taylor, W. (1981) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90085-3 · Cited by 2,309
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. (., & Simester, D. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1371 · Cited by 847
Cited by
Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0380 · Cited by 1,073
Babić Rosario, A., de Valck, K., & Sotgiu, F. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00706-1 · Cited by 462
Unstructured data in marketing
Balducci, B., & Marinova, D. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0581-x · Cited by 300
Detection of review spam: A survey
Heydari, A., Tavakoli, M. A., Salim, N., & Heydari, Z. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.029 · Cited by 290
Jin, S. V., Ryu, E., & Muqaddam, A. (2021) · Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/jfmm-04-2020-0059 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Ho-Dac, N. N., Carson, S. J., & Moore, W. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 37-53
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2169064565
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 80.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Positive and Negative Online Customer Reviews: Do Brand Strength and Category Maturity Matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jm.11.0011
- The paper
- Ho-Dac, N. N., Carson, S. J., & Moore, W. L. (2013). The Effects of Positive and Negative Online Customer Reviews: Do Brand Strength and Category Maturity Matter? Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.