The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brands as Signals: A Cross-Country Validation Study
Abstract
This article tests how well the information economics view of brand equity explains consumer brand choice in countries that represent different cultural dimensions. In this empirical analysis, the authors use survey and experimental data on orange juice and personal computers collected from respondents in Brazil, Germany, India, Japan, Spain, Turkey, and the United States. The results provide strong empirical evidence across countries for the role of brands as signals of product positions. In addition, the positive effect of brand credibility on choice is greater for consumers who rate high on either collectivism or uncertainty avoidance. Credible brands provide more value to collectivist consumers because such consumers perceive these brands as being of higher quality (i.e., reinforcing group identity). Credible brands provide more value to high-uncertainty-avoidance consumers because such brands have lower perceived risk and information costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance
Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260996 · Cited by 3,653
The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept
Hofstede, G. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4279653 · Cited by 1,257
A cross-cultural study of interpersonal information exchange
Dawar, N., Parker, P. M., & Price, L. J. (1996) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490142 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Cross-Sectional versus longitudinal survey research: concepts, findings, and guidelines
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261 · Cited by 1,305
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2011.578059 · Cited by 916
Avoiding uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE
Venaik, S., & Brewer, P. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.96 · Cited by 292
Alcañiz, E. B., Cáceres, R. C., & Pérez, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x · Cited by 291
Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals
Stremersch, S., Camacho, N., Vanneste, S., & Verniers, I. (2015) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.004 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Erdem, T., Swait́, J., & Valenzuela, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2005-12-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-49
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140231937
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brands as Signals: A Cross-Country Validation Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.34
- The paper
- Erdem, T., Swait́, J., & Valenzuela, A. (2005). Brands as Signals: A Cross-Country Validation Study. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.34
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.