The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emotional Branding and the Strategic Value of the Doppelgänger Brand Image
Abstract
Emotional branding is widely heralded as a key to marketing success. However, little attention has been given to the risks posed by this strategy. This article argues that emotional-branding strategies are conducive to the emergence of a doppelgänger brand image, which is defined as a family of disparaging images and meanings about a brand that circulate throughout popular culture. This article's thesis is that a doppelgänger brand image can undermine the perceived authenticity of an emotional-branding story and, thus, the identity value that the brand provides to consumers. The authors discuss how the tenets of emotional branding paradoxically encourage the formation and propagation of doppelgänger brand imagery. This article develops the counterintuitive proposition that rather than merely being a threat to be managed, a doppelgänger brand image can actually benefit a brand by providing early warning signs that an emotional-branding story is beginning to lose its cultural resonance. This article demonstrates these ideas through an analysis of the doppelgänger brand image that is beginning to haunt a paragon of emotional branding—Starbucks. The authors conclude with a discussion of how marketing managers can proactively use the insights gained by analyzing a doppelgänger brand image.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Thompson, C. J. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379703400403 · Cited by 1,142
Self-citationMarket-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strategy Formulation
Arnould, E. J., & Wallendorf, M. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379403100404 · Cited by 1,027
Cited by
How Brand Community Practices Create Value
Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30 · Cited by 2,444
Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale
Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006 · Cited by 1,084
Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity
Giesler, M., & Veresiu, E. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/677842 · Cited by 613
Marketing Systems—A Core Macromarketing Concept
Layton, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146707302836 · Cited by 411
Luedicke, M. K., Thompson, C. J., & Giesler, M. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/644761 · Cited by 361
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, C. J., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2005-12-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-64
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147149573
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 58.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.