Cited by 3,439Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value

Luo, Xueming, Bhattacharya, C.B.·2006·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Although prior research has addressed the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on perceived customer responses, it is not clear whether CSR affects market value of the firm. This study develops and tests a conceptual framework, which predicts that (1) customer satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between CSR and firm market value (i.e., Tobin's q and stock return), (2) corporate abilities (innovativeness capability and product quality) moderate the financial returns to CSR, and (3) these moderated relationships are mediated by customer satisfaction. Based on a large-scale secondary data set, the results show support for this framework. Notably, the authors find that in firms with low innovativeness capability, CSR actually reduces customer satisfaction levels and, through the lowered satisfaction, harms market value. The uncovered mediated and asymmetrically moderated results offer important implications for marketing theory and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature suggests a number of mediating factors that can alter the sign and strength of the relation between CSR and firm value.

    “In addition, the literature suggests a number of mediating factors that can alter the sign and the strength of the relation between CSR and firm value.”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Luo and Bhattacharya 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Luo, Xueming
  • Bhattacharya, C.B.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2006-10
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2120907018
Cited by
3,439
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 156 · 2025: 210 · 2024: 218 · 2023: 242 · 2022: 256 · 2021: 227 · 2020: 239 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 232 · 2017: 200 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 229 · 2014: 177 · 2013: 163 · 2012: 137
FWCI
130.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, firm market value, Tobin's Q, stock returns, product quality, moderating effect, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review