The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions
Abstract
This article develops empirically based guidelines to assist managers in selecting or modifying package designs for achieving desired consumer responses. Seven studies identify the key types of package designs, including the factors that differentiate those package designs, and determine how these holistic designs are related to consumer brand impressions. The selection of package designs can be simplified with the use of five holistic types: massive, contrasting, natural, delicate, and nondescript designs. Sincere brands should have natural package designs, exciting brands should have contrasting designs, competent brands should have delicate designs, sophisticated brands should have natural or delicate designs, and rugged brands should have contrasting or massive designs. The authors discuss the potential trade-offs among the impressions created by holistic design types and illustrate their findings with numerous real packages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 · Cited by 1,110
Cited by
Steenis, N. D., van Herpen, E., van der Lans, I. A., Ligthart, T. N., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036 · Cited by 493
Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005 · Cited by 382
Judging a product by its cover: Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products
Magnier, L., Schoormans, J., & Mugge, R. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.006 · Cited by 295
Packaging design: general framework and research agenda
Azzi, A., Battini, D., Persona, A., & Sgarbossa, F. (2012) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.993 · Cited by 195
Spence, C., & Velasco, C. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.008 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 64-81
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2139672112
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 72.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.064
- The paper
- Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.