The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competing Loyalty Programs: Impact of Market Saturation, Market Share, and Category Expandability
Abstract
Loyalty programs have become an important component of firms’ relationship management strategies. There are now some industries in which numerous rival loyalty programs are offered, inducing intense competition among these programs. However, existing research on loyalty programs has often studied such programs in a non-competitive setting and has often focused on a single program in isolation. Addressing this gap, this research examines the effect of a firm's competitive positioning and market saturation on the performance of the firm's loyalty program. Based on the analysis of firm- and individual-level data from the airline industry, the results indicate that larger firms tend to benefit more from their loyalty program offerings than smaller firms. Moreover, when the product category demand is rigid, the impact of an individual loyalty program decreases as the marketplace becomes more saturated with competing programs. However, when the product category is highly expandable, the saturation effect disappears. Under such situations, loyalty programs can help an industry gain competitive advantage over substitute offerings outside the industry, and multiple programs can effectively coexist even under a high level of market saturation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Implications of Loyalty Program Membership and Service Experiences for Customer Retention and Value
Bolton, R. N., Kannan, P. K., & Bramlett, M. D. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281009 · Cited by 1,157
The Influence of Loyalty Programs and Short-Term Promotions on Customer Retention
Lewis, M. (2004) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.3.281.35986 · Cited by 534
Do rewards really create loyalty?
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)94312-m · Cited by 393
Cited by
Building, measuring, and profiting from customer loyalty
Watson, G. F., Beck, J. T., Henderson, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0439-4 · Cited by 375
Yu, W., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005 · Cited by 308
The impact of introducing a customer loyalty program on category sales and profitability
Lin, C., & Bowman, D. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102769 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., & Yang, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2008-12-10
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-108
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163723143
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competing Loyalty Programs: Impact of Market Saturation, Market Share, and Category Expandability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.93
- The paper
- Liu, Y., & Yang, R. (2008). Competing Loyalty Programs: Impact of Market Saturation, Market Share, and Category Expandability. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.93
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.