The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Customer Love Turns into Lasting Hate: The Effects of Relationship Strength and Time on Customer Revenge and Avoidance
Abstract
This article explores the effects of time and relationship strength on the evolution of customer revenge and avoidance in online public complaining contexts. First, the authors examine whether online complainers hold a grudge—in terms of revenge and avoidance desires—over time. They find that time affects the two desires differently: Although revenge decreases over time, avoidance increases over time, indicating that customers indeed hold a grudge. Second, the authors examine the moderation effect of a strong relationship on how customers hold this grudge. They find that firms' best customers have the longest unfavorable reactions (i.e., a longitudinal love-becomes-hate effect). Specifically, over time, the revenge of strong-relationship customers decreases more slowly and their avoidance increases more rapidly than that of weak-relationship customers. Third, the authors explore a solution to attenuate this damaging effect—namely, the firm offering an apology and compensation after the online complaint. Overall, they find that strong-relationship customers are more amenable to any level of recovery attempt. The authors test the first two issues with a longitudinal survey and the third issue with a follow-up experiment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252174 · Cited by 4,860
Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449 · Cited by 4,196
Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1026595011371 · Cited by 4,188
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands
Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10 · Cited by 2,713
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670502004003006 · Cited by 2,301
A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery
Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152082 · Cited by 2,058
Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement
McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586 · Cited by 1,435 · cited 5×
“Although the effects of personality traits are found to be relatively weak (McCullough et al. 1998), their potential role in the rates of change in revenge and avoidance warrant further examination.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialService Failure and Recovery: The Impact of Relationship Factors on Customer Satisfaction
Hess Jr., R. L., Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. M. (2003) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302250898 · Cited by 959
Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research
Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7 · Cited by 631
Yim, C. K. (., Tse, D. K., & Chan, K. W. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.741 · Cited by 583 · cited 1×
“It would also be judicious to incorporate new conceptualizations of relationships, such as attachment (Thomson, MacInnis, and Park 2005) or affection (Yim, Tse, and Chan 2008), that capture a deeper bonding between customers and firms.”
Background
Cited by
Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions
van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375599 · Cited by 3,536
The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust
Sparks, B. A., & Browning, V. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011 · Cited by 1,688
Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research
Berger, J. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002 · Cited by 1,469
Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms
Bolton, R. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., Gallan, A., Orsingher, C., Witell, L., & Zaki, M. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0113 · Cited by 849
The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates
Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019993 · Cited by 749
Metadata
- Authors
- Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M., & Legoux, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 18-32
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2180761394
- Cited by
- 978
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 31.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
