The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resistance to Brand Switching when a Radically New Brand is Introduced: A Social Identity Theory Perspective
Abstract
There has been little research on how market disruptions affect customer–brand relationships and how firms can sustain brand loyalty when disruptions occur. Drawing from social identity theory and the brand loyalty literature, the authors propose a conceptual framework to examine these issues in a specific market disruption, namely, the introduction of a radically new brand. The framework focuses on the time-varying effects of customers’ identification with and perceived value of the incumbent relative to the new brand on switching behavior. The authors divert from the conventional economic perspective of treating brand switching as functional utility maximization to propose that brand switching can also result from customers’ social mobility between brand identities. The results from longitudinal data of 679 customers during the launch of the iPhone in Spain show that both relative customer–brand identification and relative perceived value of the incumbent inhibit switching behavior, but their effects vary over time. Relative customer–brand identification with the incumbent apparently exerts a stronger longitudinal restraint on switching behavior than relative perceived value of the incumbent. The study has important strategic implications for devising customer relationship strategies and brand investment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241 · cited 1×
“Social psychology literature suggests that while people all have the need for self-enhancement, they are highly reluctant to change their self-related attitude because the need for self-consistency is also prevalent (Festinger 1957; Lecky 1945; Swann, Rentfrow, and Guinn 2003).”
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298805200302 · Cited by 18,292
Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity
Keller, K. L. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700101 · Cited by 14,686
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Social Identity Theory and the Organization
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 · Cited by 7,671
Cited by
Confente, I., Scarpi, D., & Russo, I. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.030 · Cited by 321
Effective influencer marketing: A social identity perspective
Farivar, S., & Wang, F. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103026 · Cited by 251
Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: a meta-analytic assessment of their antecedents
Pick, D., & Eisend, M. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0349-2 · Cited by 173
Pick, D., & Eisend, M. (2016) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.15.0139 · Cited by 54
Feng, N., Su, Z., Li, D., Zheng, C., & Li, M. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.05.012 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 128-146
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2140218084
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 52.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance to Brand Switching when a Radically New Brand is Introduced: A Social Identity Theory Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.128
- The paper
- Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to Brand Switching when a Radically New Brand is Introduced: A Social Identity Theory Perspective. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.