The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait versus Evaluative Inferencing
Abstract
This research examines the dynamic process of inference updating. The authors present a framework that delineates two mechanisms that guide the updating of personality trait inferences about brands. The results of three experiments show that chronics (those for whom the trait is accessible) update their initial inferences on the basis of the trait implications of new information. Notably, nonchronics (those for whom the trait is not accessible) also update their initial inferences, but they do so on the basis of the evaluative implications of new information. The framework adds to the inference-making literature by uncovering two distinct paths of inference updating and by emphasizing the moderating role of trait accessibility. The findings have direct implications for marketers attempting to understand the construction of brand personality, and they emphasize the constantly evolving nature of brand perceptions and the notion that both the consumer and the marketer have important roles to play in this process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments.
Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.180 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77 · Cited by 1,339
Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis
Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.010 · Cited by 477
Experience Marketing: Concepts, Frameworks and Consumer Insights
Schmitt, B. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Marketing · doi:10.1561/1700000027 · Cited by 428
Gretry, A., Horváth, C., Belei, N., & van Riel, A. C. R. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.012 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Johar, G. V., Sengupta, J., & Aaker, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 458-469
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W1512894772
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait versus Evaluative Inferencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.458
- The paper
- Johar, G. V., Sengupta, J., & Aaker, J. L. (2005). Two Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait versus Evaluative Inferencing. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.