The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the Impact of Destructive Acts in Marketing Channel Relationships
Open accessAbstract
In virtually all marketing channel relationships, one of the parties eventually will engage in an action that another channel member considers potentially destructive for the relationship. How a particular channel member reacts to such an act has implications for the long-term viability and success of the relationship. On the basis of a large data set collected from both a focal supplier and its independent dealers, the authors classify dealers' responses to a supplier's destructive acts by extending the response typology of exit, voice, and loyalty, which is based on Hirschman's seminal writings on responses to decline in organizations and states. This study finds that dealers' reactions are influenced by several antecedent factors: perceived intensity of the supplier's destructive act, the attributions relative to the act, relationship quality before the act, and the level of interdependence between dealer and supplier. The results suggest that these more proximal dealer responses affect subsequent dealer performance and overall perceptions of relationship quality after an act. The authors draw several implications for both dealers and suppliers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels
Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900103 · Cited by 3,431
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Self-citation
Cited by
Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis
Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136 · Cited by 2,601
Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560610648075 · Cited by 762
Building, measuring, and profiting from customer loyalty
Watson, G. F., Beck, J. T., Henderson, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0439-4 · Cited by 375
Grayson, K., Johnson, D., & Chen, D.-F. R. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.2.241 · Cited by 234
Gratifications and social network service usage: The mediating role of online experience
Huang, L.-Y., Hsieh, Y.-J., & Wu, Y.-C. J. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.05.004 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Hibbard, J. D., Kumar, N., & Stern, L. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-61
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2103294976
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the Impact of Destructive Acts in Marketing Channel Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.45.18831
- The paper
- Hibbard, J. D., Kumar, N., & Stern, L. W. (2001). Examining the Impact of Destructive Acts in Marketing Channel Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.45.18831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.