The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables
Abstract
One of the nagging issues in using discrete choice models is how softer attributes, such as attitudes and perceptions, that are not explicitly manipulated within the context of the choice experiment can be accommodated. In many cases, it is reasonable to expect that the choice of a particular alternative may be influenced by non–product-related attributes. For example, latent attitudes and perceptions may play as much of a role in shaping choice as the attributes that have been manipulated and used to define the alternative offerings. In this article, the authors present several full information models that can accommodate latent variables such as attitudes and satisfaction within the context of binary and multinomial choice models. The models proposed are particularly useful when the focus is on understanding how softer attributes can influence choice decisions. The authors accomplish this by integrating structural equation models within the basic framework of binary and multinomial choice models. Two empirical applications are provided. In addition to illustrating the proposed models, these applications provide insights into the circumstances under which the simultaneous factor–choice modeling approach makes a difference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
Cited by
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.6.128 · Cited by 533
Marketing Mass-Customized Products: Striking a Balance between Utility and Complexity
Dellaert, B. G. C., & Stremersch, S. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.219.62293 · Cited by 417
How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful
Vij, A., & Walker, J. L. (2016) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.021 · Cited by 389
Building, measuring, and profiting from customer loyalty
Watson, G. F., Beck, J. T., Henderson, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0439-4 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashok, K., Dillon, W. R., & Yuan, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-46
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2044001430
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.31.18937
- The paper
- Ashok, K., Dillon, W. R., & Yuan, S. (2002). Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.31.18937
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.