Cited by 267Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

When Do Losses Loom Larger than Gains?

Ariely, Dan, Huber, Joel, Wertenbroch, Klaus·2005·Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract

In defining limits to loss aversion, Novemsky and Kahneman (2005) offer important new data and a needed summary of appropriate ways to think about loss aversion. In this comment to Novemsky and Kahneman's article, the authors consider the new empirical results that involve probabilistic buying and selling, suggesting caution in generalizing the results to nonprobabilistic commerce. The authors expand Novemsky and Kahneman's summary by exploring two critical constructs that help define the boundaries of loss aversion: emotional attachment and cognitive perspective. Emotional attachment alters loss aversion by moderating the degree to which parting with an item involves a loss, whereas shifts in cognitive perspective explain why items typically viewed as a loss are given more or less weight. The goal is to use these constructs to characterize more specifically contexts in which losses loom larger than gains and to suggest specific ways that research into loss aversion could evolve.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.134.62283

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss aversion appears to increase with affective enrichment of hedonic consumer goods and more generally with emotional attachment.

    “loss aversion appears to increase with affective enrichment of “hedonic” consumer goods (e.g., music CDs versus computer disks) (11) and more generally with emotional attachment (12).”

    From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • INSEAD (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Ariely, Dan
  • Huber, Joel
  • Wertenbroch, Klaus
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
2005-05
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
134-138
ISSN
  • 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7193
OpenAlex
W2061239943
Cited by
267
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
loss aversion, emotional attachment, cognitive approach, purchase decision, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review