Cited by 2,239Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsConsumer Market Behavior and PricingEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods

Dhar, Ravi, Wertenbroch, Klaus·2000·Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract

In this article, the authors examine how consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods is influenced by the nature of the decision task. Building on research on elaboration, the authors propose that the relative salience of hedonic dimensions is greater when consumers decide which of several items to give up (forfeiture choices) than when they decide which item to acquire (acquisition choices). The resulting hypothesis that a hedonic item is relatively preferred over the same utilitarian item in forfeiture choices than in acquisition choices was supported in two choice experiments. In a subsequent experiment, these findings were extended to hypothetical choices in which the acquisition and forfeiture conditions were created by manipulating initial attribute-level reference states instead of ownership. Finally, consistent with the experimental findings, a field survey showed that, relative to market prices, owners of relatively hedonic cars value their vehicles more than do owners of relatively utilitarian cars. The authors discuss theoretical implications of these reference-dependent preference asymmetries and explore consequences for marketing managers and other decision makers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss aversion appears to increase with affective enrichment of hedonic consumer goods and more generally with emotional attachment.

    “loss aversion appears to increase with affective enrichment of “hedonic” consumer goods (e.g., music CDs versus computer disks) (11) and more generally with emotional attachment (12).”

    From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • INSEAD (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Dhar, Ravi
  • Wertenbroch, Klaus
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
2000-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
60-71
ISSN
  • 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7193
OpenAlex
W2086670988
Cited by
2,239
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 125 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 126 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 127 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 100
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
consumer choice, elaboration, reference-dependent preferences, reference state, vehicle valuation, product attributes, discrete choice experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review